The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Φ-Value analysis and the nature of protein-folding transition states
Open accessAbstract
Φ values are used to map structures of protein-folding transition states from changes in free energies of denaturation (ΔΔ G D-N ) and activation on mutation. A recent reappraisal proposed that Φ values for ΔΔ G D-N < 1.7 kcal/mol are artifactual. On discarding such derived Φ values from published studies, the authors concluded that there are no high Φ values in diffuse transition states, which are consequently uniformly diffuse with no evidence for nucleation. However, values of ΔΔ G D-N > 1.7 kcal/mol are often found for large side chains that make dispersed tertiary interactions, especially in hydrophobic cores that are in the process of being formed in the transition state. Conversely, specific local interactions that probe secondary structure tend to have ΔΔ G D-N ≈ 0.5–2 kcal/mol. Discarding Φ values from lower-energy changes discards the crucial information about local interactions and makes transition states appear uniformly diffuse by overemphasizing the dispersed tertiary interactions. The evidence for the 1.7 kcal/mol cutoff was based on mutations that had been deliberately designed to be unsuitable for Φ-value analysis because they are structurally disruptive. We confirm that reliable Φ values can be derived from the recommended mutations in suitable proteins with 0.6 < ΔΔ G D-N < 1.7 kcal/mol, and there are many reliable high Φ values. Transition states vary from being rather diffuse to being well formed with islands of near-complete secondary structure. We also confirm that the structures of transition-state ensembles can be perturbed by mutations with ΔΔ G D-N » 2 kcal/mol and that protein-folding transition states do move on the energy surface on mutation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins
Shaw, D. E., Maragakis, P., Lindorff-Larsen, K., Piana, S., Dror, R. O., Eastwood, M. P., Bank, J. A., Jumper, J. M., Salmon, J. K., Shan, Y., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1187409 · Cited by 1,923
Dill, K. A., Ozkan, S. B., Shell, M. S., & Weikl, T. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558 · Cited by 1,163
Das, P., Moll, M., Stamati, H., Kavraki, L. E., & Clementi, C. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0603553103 · Cited by 331
Korzhnev, D. M., & Kay, L. E. (2008) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar700189y · Cited by 268
Eildal, J. N. N., Hultqvist, G., Balle, T., Stuhr-Hansen, N., Padrah, S., Gianni, S., Strømgaard, K., & Jemth, P. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja402875h · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Fersht, A. R., & Sato, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-05-18
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 7976-7981
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2161859154
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Φ-Value analysis and the nature of protein-folding transition states. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0402684101
- The paper
- Fersht, A. R., & Sato, S. (2004). Φ-Value analysis and the nature of protein-folding transition states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402684101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.