Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kinetics of regulated protein–protein interactions revealed with firefly luciferase complementation imaging in cells and living animals

Open access
Luker, Kathryn E., Smith, Matthew C. P., Luker, Gary D., Gammon, Seth T., Piwnica-Worms, Helen, Piwnica-Worms, David·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Signaling pathways regulating proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis are commonly mediated through protein–protein interactions as well as reversible phosphorylation of proteins. To facilitate the study of regulated protein–protein interactions in cells and living animals, we optimized firefly luciferase protein fragment complementation by screening incremental truncation libraries of N- and C-terminal fragments of luciferase. Fused to the rapamycin-binding domain (FRB) of the kinase mammalian target of rapamycin and FK506-binding protein 12 (FKBP), respectively, the optimized FRB-N-terminal luciferase fragment (NLuc)/C-terminal luciferase fragment (CLuc)-FKBP luciferase complementation imaging (LCI) pair reconstituted luciferase activity in cells upon single-site binding of rapamycin in an FK506-competitive manner. LCI was used in three independent applications. In mice bearing implants of cells expressing the FRB-NLuc/CLuc-FKBP LCI pair, dose- and time-dependent luciferase activity allowed target-specific pharmacodynamic analysis of rapamycin-induced protein–protein interactions in vivo . In cells expressing a Cdc25C-NLuc/CLuc-14-3-3ε LCI pair, drug-mediated disruption of cell cycle regulated protein–protein interactions was demonstrated with the protein kinase inhibitor UCN-01 in a phosphoserine-dependent manner. When applied to IFN-γ-dependent activation of Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), LCI revealed, in the absence of ligand-induced phosphorylation, STAT1 proteins existing in live cells as preformed dimers. Thus, optimized LCI provides a platform for near real-time detection and characterization of regulated and small molecule-induced protein–protein interactions in intact cells and living animals and should enable a wide range of novel applications in drug discovery, chemical genetics, and proteomics research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0404041101

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 439

Metadata

Authors
Luker, K. E., Smith, M. C. P., Luker, G. D., Gammon, S. T., Piwnica-Worms, H., & Piwnica-Worms, D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-07-29
Volume
101
Issue
33
Pages
12288-12293
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2152439945
Cited by
439
References
3
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetics of regulated protein–protein interactions revealed with firefly luciferase complementation imaging in cells and living animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0404041101
The paper
Luker, K. E., Smith, M. C. P., Luker, G. D., Gammon, S. T., Piwnica-Worms, H., & Piwnica-Worms, D. (2004). Kinetics of regulated protein–protein interactions revealed with firefly luciferase complementation imaging in cells and living animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404041101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.