The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compound library development guided by protein structure similarity clustering and natural product structure
Open accessAbstract
To identify biologically relevant and drug-like protein ligands for medicinal chemistry and chemical biology research the grouping of proteins according to evolutionary relationships and conservation of molecular recognition is an established method. We propose to employ structure similarity clustering of the ligand-sensing cores of protein domains (PSSC) in conjunction with natural product guided compound library development as a synergistic approach for the identification of biologically prevalidated ligands with high fidelity. This is supported by the concepts that ( i ) in nature spatial structure is more conserved than amino acid sequence, ( ii ) the number of fold types characteristic for all protein domains is limited, and ( iii ) the underlying frameworks of natural product classes with multiple biological activities provide evolutionarily selected starting points in structural space. On the basis of domain core similarity considerations and irrespective of sequence similarity, Cdc25A phosphatase, acetylcholinesterase, and 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases type 1 and type 2 were grouped into a similarity cluster. A 147-member compound collection derived from the naturally occurring Cdc25A inhibitor dysidiolide yielded potent and selective inhibitors of the other members of the similarity cluster with a hit rate of 2–3%. Protein structure similarity clustering may provide an experimental opportunity to identify supersites in proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can We Learn To Distinguish between “Drug-like” and “Nondrug-like” Molecules?
Ajay, Walters, W. P., & Murcko, M. A. (1998) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm970666c · Cited by 484
A Scoring Scheme for Discriminating between Drugs and Nondrugs
Sadowski, J., & Kubinyi, H. (1998) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm9706776 · Cited by 392
Steroid disorders in children: congenital adrenal hyperplasia and apparent mineralocorticoid excess
New, M. I., & Wilson, R. C. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.22.12790 · Cited by 164
Cited by
Impact of Natural Products on Developing New Anti-Cancer Agents
Cragg, G. M., Grothaus, P. G., & Newman, D. J. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900019j · Cited by 1,302
Natural Products as Leads to Potential Drugs: An Old Process or the New Hope for Drug Discovery?
Newman, D. J. (2008) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0704090 · Cited by 716
Charting, Navigating, and Populating Natural Product Chemical Space for Drug Discovery
Lachance, H., Wetzel, S., Kumar, K., & Waldmann, H. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm300288g · Cited by 398
Self-citationBachmann, B. O., & Ravel, J. (2009) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(09)04808-3 · Cited by 370
The Scaffold Tree − Visualization of the Scaffold Universe by Hierarchical Scaffold Classification
Schuffenhauer, A., Ertl, P., Roggo, S., Wetzel, S., Koch, M. A., & Waldmann, H. (2007) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci600338x · Cited by 364
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Koch, M. A., Wittenberg, L.-O., Basu, S., Jeyaraj, D. A., Gourzoulidou, E., Reinecke, K., Odermatt, A., & Waldmann, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-11-17
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 16721-16726
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2094337652
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compound library development guided by protein structure similarity clustering and natural product structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0404719101
- The paper
- Koch, M. A., Wittenberg, L.-O., Basu, S., Jeyaraj, D. A., Gourzoulidou, E., Reinecke, K., Odermatt, A., & Waldmann, H. (2004). Compound library development guided by protein structure similarity clustering and natural product structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404719101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.