Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Compound library development guided by protein structure similarity clustering and natural product structure

Open access
Koch, Marcus A., Wittenberg, Lars-Oliver, Basu, Sudipta, Jeyaraj, Duraiswamy A., Gourzoulidou, Eleni, Reinecke, Kerstin, Odermatt, Alex, Waldmann, Herbert·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

To identify biologically relevant and drug-like protein ligands for medicinal chemistry and chemical biology research the grouping of proteins according to evolutionary relationships and conservation of molecular recognition is an established method. We propose to employ structure similarity clustering of the ligand-sensing cores of protein domains (PSSC) in conjunction with natural product guided compound library development as a synergistic approach for the identification of biologically prevalidated ligands with high fidelity. This is supported by the concepts that ( i ) in nature spatial structure is more conserved than amino acid sequence, ( ii ) the number of fold types characteristic for all protein domains is limited, and ( iii ) the underlying frameworks of natural product classes with multiple biological activities provide evolutionarily selected starting points in structural space. On the basis of domain core similarity considerations and irrespective of sequence similarity, Cdc25A phosphatase, acetylcholinesterase, and 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases type 1 and type 2 were grouped into a similarity cluster. A 147-member compound collection derived from the naturally occurring Cdc25A inhibitor dysidiolide yielded potent and selective inhibitors of the other members of the similarity cluster with a hit rate of 2–3%. Protein structure similarity clustering may provide an experimental opportunity to identify supersites in proteins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0404719101

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Koch, M. A., Wittenberg, L.-O., Basu, S., Jeyaraj, D. A., Gourzoulidou, E., Reinecke, K., Odermatt, A., & Waldmann, H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-11-17
Volume
101
Issue
48
Pages
16721-16726
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2094337652
Cited by
196
References
3
FWCI
15.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compound library development guided by protein structure similarity clustering and natural product structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0404719101
The paper
Koch, M. A., Wittenberg, L.-O., Basu, S., Jeyaraj, D. A., Gourzoulidou, E., Reinecke, K., Odermatt, A., & Waldmann, H. (2004). Compound library development guided by protein structure similarity clustering and natural product structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404719101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.