The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanical feedback as a possible regulator of tissue growth
Open accessAbstract
Regulation of cell growth and proliferation has a fundamental role in animal and plant development and in the progression of cancer. In the context of development, it is important to understand the mechanisms that coordinate growth and patterning of tissues. Imaginal discs, which are larval precursors of fly limbs and organs, have provided much of what we currently know about these processes. Here, we consider the mechanism that is responsible for the observed uniformity of growth in wing imaginal discs, which persists in the presence of gradients in growth inducing morphogens in spite of the stochastic nature of cell division. The phenomenon of “cell competition,” which manifests in apoptosis of slower-growing cells in the vicinity of faster growing tissue, suggests that uniform growth is not a default state but a result of active regulation. How can a patch of tissue compare its growth rate with that of its surroundings? A possible way is furnished by mechanical interactions. To demonstrate this mechanism, we formulate a mathematical model of nonuniform growth in a layer of tissue and examine its mechanical implications. We show that a clone growing faster or slower than the surrounding tissue is subject to mechanical stress, and we propose that dependence of the rate of cell division on local stress could provide an “integral-feedback” mechanism stabilizing uniform growth. The proposed mechanism of growth control is not specific to imaginal disc growth and could be of general relevance. Several experimental tests of the proposed mechanism are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cox, R. T., Kirkpatrick, C., & Peifer, M. (1996) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.134.1.133 · Cited by 300
A mechanical model for epithelial morphogenesis
Odell, G., Oster, G., Burnside, B., & Alberch, P. (1980) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00276030 · Cited by 44
Cited by
The Mechanics and Statistics of Active Matter
Ramaswamy, S. (2010) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-070909-104101 · Cited by 2,038
Nia, H. T., Munn, L. L., & Jain, R. K. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz0868 · Cited by 855
Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics
Nelson, C. M., Jean, R. P., Tan, J. L., Liu, W. F., Sniadecki, N. J., Spector, A. A., & Chen, C. S. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0502575102 · Cited by 853
Mechanotransduction in development: a growing role for contractility
Wozniak, M. A., & Chen, C. S. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2592 · Cited by 818
Nature and anisotropy of cortical forces orienting Drosophila tissue morphogenesis
Rauzi, M., Verant, P., Lecuit, T., & Lenne, P.-F. (2008) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1798 · Cited by 615
Metadata
- Authors
- Shraiman, B. I.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-02-22
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3318-3323
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2000618372
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical feedback as a possible regulator of tissue growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0404782102
- The paper
- Shraiman, B. I. (2005). Mechanical feedback as a possible regulator of tissue growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404782102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.