Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metabonomic investigations in mice infected with Schistosoma mansoni : An approach for biomarker identification

Open access
Wang, Yulan, Holmes, Elaine, Nicholson, Jeremy K., Cloarec, Olivier, Chollet, Jacques, Tanner, Marcel, Singer, Burton H., Utzinger, Jürg·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Schistosomiasis, a chronic and debilitating parasitic disease, affects ≈200 million people in the developing world and imposes a substantial public health and economic impact. Accurately diagnosing at the individual level, monitoring disease progression, and assessing the impact of pharmacological interventions at the population level are of prime importance for controlling schistosomiasis. Using a Schistosoma mansoni -mouse model, we present a characterization of a parasitic infection by metabolic profiling, employing 1 H NMR spectroscopy and multivariate pattern recognition techniques. We infected 10 mice with 80 S. mansoni cercariae each and collected urine samples 49 and 56 days postinfection. Urine samples were also obtained from 10 uninfected control mice at the same time. The metabolic signature of an S. mansoni infection consists of reduced levels of the tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates, including citrate, succinate, and 2-oxoglutarate, and increased levels of pyruvate, suggesting stimulated glycolysis. A disturbance of amino acid metabolism was also associated with an S. mansoni infection, as indicated by depletion of taurine, 2-oxoisocaproate, and 2-oxoisovalerate and elevation of tryptophan in the urine. A range of microbial-related metabolites, i.e., trimethylamine, phenylacetylglycine, acetate, p -cresol glucuronide, butyrate, propionate, and hippurate, were also coupled with an S. mansoni infection, indicating disturbances in the gut microbiota. Our work highlights the potential of metabolic profiling to enhance our understanding of biological responses to parasitic infections. It also holds promise as a basis for novel diagnostic tests with high sensitivity and specificity and for improved disease surveillance and control.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0404878101

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., Holmes, E., Nicholson, J. K., Cloarec, O., Chollet, J., Tanner, M., Singer, B. H., & Utzinger, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-08-16
Volume
101
Issue
34
Pages
12676-12681
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2086108438
Cited by
272
References
37
FWCI
10.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabonomic investigations in mice infected with Schistosoma mansoni : An approach for biomarker identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0404878101
The paper
Wang, Y., Holmes, E., Nicholson, J. K., Cloarec, O., Chollet, J., Tanner, M., Singer, B. H., & Utzinger, J. (2004). Metabonomic investigations in mice infected with Schistosoma mansoni : An approach for biomarker identification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404878101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.