Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role of the cAMP signaling pathway in the regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in GT1 cells

Vitalis, Elizabeth A., Costantin, James L., Tsai, Pei-San, Sakakibara, Hideya, Paruthiyil, Sreenivasan, Iiri, Taroh, Martini, Jean-Francois, Taga, Michiyoshi, Choi, Amy L. H., Charles, Andrew C., Weiner, Richard I.·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We studied the signaling pathways coupling gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion to elevations in cAMP levels in the GT1 GnRH-secreting neuronal cell line. We hypothesized that increased cAMP could be acting directly by means of cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) cation channels or indirectly by means of activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). We showed that GT1 cells express the three CNG subunits present in olfactory neurons (CNG2, -4.3, and -5) and exhibit functional cAMP-gated cation channels. Activation of PKA does not appear to be necessary for the stimulation of GnRH release by increased levels of cAMP. In fact, pharmacological inhibition of PKA activity caused an increase in the basal secretion of GnRH. Consistent with this observation activation PKA inhibited adenylyl cyclase activity, presumably by inhibiting adenylyl cyclase V expressed in the cells. Therefore, the stimulation of GnRH release by elevations in cAMP appears to be the result of depolarization of the neurons initiated by increased cation conductance by cAMP-gated cation channels. Activation of PKA may constitute a negative-feedback mechanisms for lowering cAMP levels. We hypothesize that these mechanisms could result in oscillations in cAMP levels, providing a biochemical basis for timing the pulsatile release of GnRH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.040545197

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90028-E · DOI
  2. 10.1210/endo-129-3-1584 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1852 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.89.9.4149 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.89.18.8462 · DOI
  6. C Kordon, S Drouva, G Martinez de la Escalera, R I Weiner The Physiology of Reproduction, ed E N J Knobil (Raven, 2nd Ed., New York) 1, 1621–1681 (1994).
  7. 10.1159/000054316 · DOI
  8. 10.1210/endo.131.6.1280208 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.88.24.11124 · DOI
  10. 10.1210/endo.135.4.7523101 · DOI
  11. 10.1210/endo.135.4.7925125 · DOI
  12. 10.1210/endo.131.3.1354602 · DOI
  13. 10.1159/000126853 · DOI
  14. 10.1152/jn.1995.73.1.56 · DOI
  15. 10.1507/endocrj.44.73 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.86.20.8132 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/325442a0 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10135 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/347184a0 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4696 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90029-9 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1210/endo.136.5.7720648 · DOI
  24. 10.1152/jn.1999.82.1.429 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0003-2697(74)90222-X · DOI
  26. 10.1152/ajpcell.1984.246.3.C224 · DOI
  27. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-13-05332.1999 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.91.19.8890 · DOI
  29. 10.1152/ajpcell.1986.250.3.C486 · DOI
  30. 10.1074/jbc.270.21.12481 · DOI
  31. 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9809 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.2472670 · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.92.6.1856 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0301-4622(98)00119-7 · DOI
  35. 10.1159/000054386 · DOI
  36. R Alvarez, C Sette, D Yang, R M Eglen, R Wilhelm, E R Shelton, M Conti Mol Pharmacol 48, 616–622 (1995).
  37. 10.1126/science.6259734 · DOI
  38. 10.1159/000054293 · DOI
  39. 10.1210/endo.140.3.6559 · DOI
  40. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-05898.1999 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)45175-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 66

Metadata

Authors
Vitalis, E. A., Costantin, J. L., Tsai, P.-S., Sakakibara, H., Paruthiyil, S., Iiri, T., Martini, J.-F., Taga, M., Choi, A. L. H., Charles, A. C., & Weiner, R. I.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-02-04
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
1861-1866
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
66
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review