Cited by 239Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionBiochemical and Structural Characterization

The modular architecture of protein–protein binding interfaces

Open access
Reichmann, D., Rahat, O., Albeck, S., Meged, R., Dym, O., Schreiber, G.·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions are essential for life. Yet, our understanding of the general principles governing binding is not complete. In the present study, we show that the interface between proteins is built in a modular fashion; each module is comprised of a number of closely interacting residues, with few interactions between the modules. The boundaries between modules are defined by clustering the contact map of the interface. We show that mutations in one module do not affect residues located in a neighboring module. As a result, the structural and energetic consequences of the deletion of entire modules are surprisingly small. To the contrary, within their module, mutations cause complex energetic and structural consequences. Experimentally, this phenomenon is shown on the interaction between TEM1-beta-lactamase and beta-lactamase inhibitor protein (BLIP) by using multiple-mutant analysis and x-ray crystallography. Replacing an entire module of five interface residues with Ala created a large cavity in the interface, with no effect on the detailed structure of the remaining interface. The modular architecture of binding sites, which resembles human engineering design, greatly simplifies the design of new protein interactions and provides a feasible view of how these interactions evolved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0407280102

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reichmann, D., Rahat, O., Albeck, S., Meged, R., Dym, O., & Schreiber, G.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Schreiber, G.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-12-23
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
57-62
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2165319219
Cited by
239
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, binding interface, modular architecture, module boundaries, BLIP
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, beta-Lactamases, Binding Sites, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Binding, Proteins, Thermodynamics, Protein Structure, Tertiary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review