Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic predictors of the maximum doses patients receive during clinical use of the anti-epileptic drugs carbamazepine and phenytoin

Open access
Tate, Sarah K., Depondt, Chantal, Sisodiya, Sanjay M., Cavalleri, Gianpiero L., Schorge, Stephanie, Soranzo, Nicole, Thom, Maria, Sen, Arjune, Shorvon, Simon D., Sander, Josemir W., Wood, Nicholas W., Goldstein, David B.·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Phenytoin and carbamazepine are effective and inexpensive anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). As with many AEDs, a broad range of doses is used, with the final “maintenance” dose normally determined by trial and error. Although many genes could influence response to these medicines, there are obvious candidates. Both drugs target the α-subunit of the sodium channel, encoded by the SCN family of genes. Phenytoin is principally metabolized by CYP2C9, and both are probable substrates of the drug transporter P-glycoprotein. We therefore assessed whether variation in these genes associates with the clinical use of carbamazepine and phenytoin in cohorts of 425 and 281 patients, respectively. We report that a known functional polymorphism in CYP2C9 is highly associated with the maximum dose of phenytoin (P= 0.0066). We also show that an intronic polymorphism in the SCN1A gene shows significant association with maximum doses in regular usage of both carbamazepine and phenytoin (P= 0.0051 and P= 0.014, respectively). This polymorphism disrupts the consensus sequence of the 5′ splice donor site of a highly conserved alternative exon (5N), and it significantly affects the proportions of the alternative transcripts in individuals with a history of epilepsy. These results provide evidence of a drug target polymorphism associated with the clinical use of AEDs and set the stage for a prospective evaluation of how pharmacogenetic diagnostics can be used to improve dosing decisions in the use of phenytoin and carbamazepine. Although the case made here is compelling, our results cannot be considered definitive or ready for clinical application until they are confirmed by independent replication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0407346102

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Tate, S. K., Depondt, C., Sisodiya, S. M., Cavalleri, G. L., Schorge, S., Soranzo, N., Thom, M., Sen, A., Shorvon, S. D., Sander, J. W., Wood, N. W., & Goldstein, D. B.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-04
Volume
102
Issue
15
Pages
5507-5512
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2107104883
Cited by
345
References
1
FWCI
18.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic predictors of the maximum doses patients receive during clinical use of the anti-epileptic drugs carbamazepine and phenytoin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0407346102
The paper
Tate, S. K., Depondt, C., Sisodiya, S. M., Cavalleri, G. L., Schorge, S., Soranzo, N., Thom, M., Sen, A., Shorvon, S. D., Sander, J. W., Wood, N. W., & Goldstein, D. B. (2005). Genetic predictors of the maximum doses patients receive during clinical use of the anti-epileptic drugs carbamazepine and phenytoin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407346102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.