The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic networks with canalyzing Boolean rules are always stable
Open accessAbstract
We determine stability and attractor properties of random Boolean genetic network models with canalyzing rules for a variety of architectures. For all power law, exponential, and flat in-degree distributions, we find that the networks are dynamically stable. Furthermore, for architectures with few inputs per node, the dynamics of the networks is close to critical. In addition, the fraction of genes that are active decreases with the number of inputs per node. These results are based upon investigating ensembles of networks using analytical methods. Also, for different in-degree distributions, the numbers of fixed points and cycles are calculated, with results intuitively consistent with stability analysis; fewer inputs per node implies more cycles, and vice versa. There are hints that genetic networks acquire broader degree distributions with evolution, and hence our results indicate that for single cells, the dynamics should become more stable with evolution. However, such an effect is very likely compensated for by multicellular dynamics, because one expects less stability when interactions among cells are included. We verify this by simulations of a simple model for interactions among cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Lee, T. I., Rinaldi, N. J., Robert, F., Odom, D. T., Bar-Joseph, Z., Gerber, G. K., Hannett, N. M., Harbison, C. T., Thompson, C. M., Simon, I., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1075090 · Cited by 2,956
Cited by
Robustness can evolve gradually in complex regulatory gene networks with varying topology
Ciliberti, S., Martin, O. C., & Wagner, A. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030015 · Cited by 390
Boolean network models of cellular regulation: prospects and limitations
Bornholdt, S. (2008) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0132.focus · Cited by 394
Modelling Crop Improvement in a G×E×M Framework via Gene–Trait–Phenotype Relationships
Messina, C., Hammer, G., Dong, Z., Podlich, D., & Cooper, M. (2009) · Crop Physiology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374431-9.00010-4 · Cited by 121
Gene-to-phenotype models and complex trait genetics
Cooper, M., Podlich, D. W., & Smith, O. S. (2005) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar05154 · Cited by 104
Guiding the self-organization of random Boolean networks
Gershenson, C. (2012) · Theory in Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12064-011-0144-x · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Kauffman, S., Peterson, C., Samuelsson, B., & Troein, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-11-30
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 17102-17107
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2097263107
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic networks with canalyzing Boolean rules are always stable. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0407783101
- The paper
- Kauffman, S., Peterson, C., Samuelsson, B., & Troein, C. (2004). Genetic networks with canalyzing Boolean rules are always stable. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407783101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.