Boolean network models of cellular regulation: prospects and limitations
Open accessAbstract
Computer models are valuable tools towards an understanding of the cell's biochemical regulatory machinery. Possible levels of description of such models range from modelling the underlying biochemical details to top-down approaches, using tools from the theory of complex networks. The latter, coarse-grained approach is taken where regulatory circuits are classified in graph-theoretical terms, with the elements of the regulatory networks being reduced to simply nodes and links, in order to obtain architectural information about the network. Further, considering dynamics on networks at such an abstract level seems rather unlikely to match dynamical regulatory activity of biological cells. Therefore, it came as a surprise when recently examples of discrete dynamical network models based on very simplistic dynamical elements emerged which in fact do match sequences of regulatory patterns of their biological counterparts. Here I will review such discrete dynamical network models, or Boolean networks, of biological regulatory networks. Further, we will take a look at such models extended with stochastic noise, which allow studying the role of network topology in providing robustness against noise. In the end, we will discuss the interesting question of why at all such simple models can describe aspects of biology despite their simplicity. Finally, prospects of Boolean models in exploratory dynamical models for biological circuits and their mutants will be discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The basic McCulloch-Pitts design is common to many other living systems, including gene regulatory networks, immune networks, collective intelligence or some aneural systems, such as quorum-sensing decisions in microbial communities.
“Interestingly, the basic McCulloch–Pitts design is common to many other living systems, including gene regulatory networks [256–259], immune networks [260–262], collective intelligence [263–267] or some aneural systems, such as quorum-sensing decisions in microbial communities, where an explicit equivalence has been defined [268].”
From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [259]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gene regulatory network inference: Data integration in dynamic models—A review
Hecker, M., Lambeck, S., Toepfer, S., van Someren, E., & Guthke, R. (2009) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.12.004 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Statistical physics of liquid brains
Piñero, J., & Solé, R. (2019) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2018.0376 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems
Solé, R., Kempes, C. P., Corominas-Murtra, B., De Domenico, M., Kolchinsky, A., Lachmann, M., Libby, E., Saavedra, S., Smith, E., & Wolpert, D. (2024) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2024.0010 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Evolution of Brains and Computers: The Roads Not Taken
Solé, R., & Seoane, L. F. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24050665 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bornholdt, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Bremen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bornholdt, Stefan
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2008-05-28
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- S85-94
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-5689
- PMC
- PMC2386560
- OpenAlex
- W2142400903
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
- Keywords
- Boolean networks, gene regulatory networks, cell regulation, discrete dynamical systems, network topology, noise robustness, stochastic noise, regulatory circuits, biological circuits
- MeSH terms
- Cell Cycle, Computer Simulation, Models, Biological, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces, Stochastic Processes, Systems Biology, Metabolic Networks and Pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review