The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic reassembly of peptide RADA16 nanofiber scaffold
Open accessAbstract
Nanofiber structures of some peptides and proteins as biological materials have been studied extensively, but their molecular mechanism of self-assembly and reassembly still remains unclear. We report here the reassembly of an ionic self-complementary peptide RADARADARADARADA (RADA16-I) that forms a well defined nanofiber scaffold. The 16-residue peptide forms stable β-sheet structure and undergoes molecular self-assembly into nanofibers and eventually a scaffold hydrogel consisting of >99.5% water. In this study, the nanofiber scaffold was sonicated into smaller fragments. Circular dichroism, atomic force microscopy, and rheology were used to follow the kinetics of the reassembly. These sonicated fragments not only quickly reassemble into nanofibers that were indistinguishable from the original material, but their reassembly also correlated with the rheological analyses showing an increase of scaffold rigidity as a function of nanofiber length. The disassembly and reassembly processes were repeated four times and, each time, the reassembly reached the original length. We proposed a plausible sliding diffusion model to interpret the reassembly involving complementary nanofiber cohesive ends. This reassembly process is important for fabrication of new scaffolds for 3D cell culture, tissue repair, and regenerative medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Caughey, B., & Lansbury, P. T. (2003) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.010302.081142 · Cited by 1,650
A tough biodegradable elastomer
Wang, Y., Ameer, G. A., Sheppard, B. J., & Langer, R. (2002) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0602-602 · Cited by 1,314
Gajdusek, D. C. (1994) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/bf02778003 · Cited by 60
Cited by
Jagur‐Grodzinski, J. (2006) · Polymers for Advanced Technologies · doi:10.1002/pat.729 · Cited by 394
Design and applications of man-made biomimetic fibrillar hydrogels
Prince, E., & Kumacheva, E. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0077-9 · Cited by 379
Prebiotic Peptides: Molecular Hubs in the Origin of Life
Frenkel-Pinter, M., Samanta, M., Ashkenasy, G., & Leman, L. J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00664 · Cited by 354
Dong, H., Paramonov, S. E., Aulisa, L., Bakota, E. L., & Hartgerink, J. D. (2007) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja072536r · Cited by 344
A microfluidic platform for 3-dimensional cell culture and cell-based assays
Kim, M. S., Yeon, J. H., & Park, J.-K. (2007) · Biomedical Microdevices · doi:10.1007/s10544-006-9016-4 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Yokoi, H., Kinoshita, T., & Zhang, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-06-06
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 8414-8419
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2035438422
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic reassembly of peptide RADA16 nanofiber scaffold. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0407843102
- The paper
- Yokoi, H., Kinoshita, T., & Zhang, S. (2005). Dynamic reassembly of peptide RADA16 nanofiber scaffold. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407843102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.