Cited by 1,091Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesArchaeological and Geological StudiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 27 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Fermented beverages of pre- and proto-historic China

Open access

Abstract

Chemical analyses of ancient organics absorbed into pottery jars from the early Neolithic village of Jiahu in Henan province in China have revealed that a mixed fermented beverage of rice, honey, and fruit (hawthorn fruit and/or grape) was being produced as early as the seventh millennium before Christ (B.C.). This prehistoric drink paved the way for unique cereal beverages of the proto-historic second millennium B.C., remarkably preserved as liquids inside sealed bronze vessels of the Shang and Western Zhou Dynasties. These findings provide direct evidence for fermented beverages in ancient Chinese culture, which were of considerable social, religious, and medical significance, and help elucidate their earliest descriptions in the Shang Dynasty oracle inscriptions.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Chemical analyses of organic residues in Neolithic pottery from Jiahu and liquids sealed in Shang/Western Zhou bronze vessels show that fermented beverages were made in China by the seventh millennium B.C. and that production later shifted toward specialized mold-saccharified rice and millet wines. The Jiahu beverage was a mixed rice, honey, and fruit drink, while proto-historic bronze-vessel liquids were aromatic rice or millet wines.

Key findings

  • Of 16 Jiahu pottery sherds analyzed, 13 were chemically similar and yielded evidence for a mixed fermented beverage of rice, honey, and fruit (hawthorn and/or grape); tartaric acid/tartrate was supported by positive Feigl spot tests for those 13 samples, and δ¹³C values averaged -25.1‰, consistent with a C3 plant such as rice or grape rather than a C4 plant such as millet.
  • The Jiahu samples contained an n-alkane series C23–C36, interpreted as deriving from epicuticular wax and/or beeswax, with beeswax serving as a biomarker of honey; rice was strongly suggested by FT-IR and HPLC matches and is the only cereal recovered archaeobotanically at Jiahu.
  • Liquids from tightly lidded late Shang/early Western Zhou bronze vessels (ca. 1250–1000 B.C.) from Anyang and the Changzikou Tomb were identified as fermented and filtered rice or millet “wines,” likely jiu or chang; the Changzikou sample gave δ¹³C = -25.3‰ (C3 plant, such as rice), whereas the Anyang liquid gave δ¹³C = -15.9‰, indicating a C4 plant, most likely millet.
  • Aromatic compounds in the bronze-vessel liquids included camphor, α-cedrene, benzaldehyde, β-amyrin, and oleanolic acid; beeswax and epicuticular wax compounds were absent, implying no honey or plant additive in those proto-historic beverages.

Methods

  • Combined chemical, archaeobotanical, and archaeological approach: 16 pottery sherds from domestic contexts at Jiahu, radiocarbon-dated and dendro-calibrated to subperiods III (ca. 7000–6600 B.C.), II (ca. 6600–6200 B.C.), and I (ca. 6200–5500 B.C.), plus liquid samples from two lidded bronze vessels dated ca. 1250–1000 B.C. (Liu Jiazhuang Tomb at Anyang and Changzikou Tomb in Luyi county).
  • Five analytical methods were used: GC-MS, HPLC-MS, FT-IR, stable isotope analysis (δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N), and selective Feigl spot tests for tartaric and oxalic acids; extractions used methanol, chloroform, and/or hexane, with blanks and database matches against ancient and modern reference compounds.
  • Volatile compounds in liquid samples were detected by purge-and-trap thermal desorption GC-MS; stable isotope measurements were made on filtered solids and chloroform/methanol extracts.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: direct chemical evidence of alcohol is lacking because ethanol is volatile and susceptible to microbial attack, so fermentation at Jiahu is inferred from the presence of honey, sugar-rich fruit, and “wine yeast” sources rather than measured directly.
  • Stated in the paper: chemical identification is often impeded by environmental and microbial degradation, modern contamination, ancient human processing, and incomplete regional biomarker surveys; some data were unavailable because of small sample size, cycloartenol was not detected possibly because of degradation, and three Jiahu samples gave less definitive determinations likely because they were extremely small.
  • Evident from the text: the conclusions rest on a limited number of samples—16 Jiahu sherds and two bronze-vessel liquids—and some supporting archaeobotanical evidence for hawthorn at Jiahu is cited as unpublished data (Z. Zhao and Z. Kong), while inferences from vessel style and context are described by the authors as lower-probability than the chemical analyses.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0407921102

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

24 Own interpretation · 20 Own result · 12 Sources not found · 8 No basis given · 6 Not checked yet · 3 Own method · 1 No full text of the sources

Verify all 6 references — free account

Show all 40 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 29
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 7
34 of 34
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Rice is the only cereal recovered by archaeobotanical methods at Jiahu, and it is predominant in the corpus.

    “In fact, rice is the only cereal that has been recovered by archaeobotanical methods at Jiahu, and it is predominant in the corpus.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Beeswax is virtually impossible to filter out completely when processing honey, so its compounds can serve as biomarkers of honey.

    “They serve as biomarkers of honey, because beeswax is virtually impossible to filter out completely when processing honey, and its compounds can be very well preserved.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The sugars in honey, mainly fructose and glucose, rapidly degrade and are lost.

    “By contrast, the sugars in honey, mainly fructose and glucose, rapidly degrade and are lost.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) occurs in honey and on the skins of sugar-rich fruits.

    “Fermentation of the mixed ingredients, however, can be inferred, because the ''wine yeast'' ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae ) occurs in honey and on the skins of sugar-rich fruits.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cereals lack yeast.

    “Because cereals lack yeast, the initiation of fermentation would have required a high-sugar fruit and ∕ or honey, as attested by the Jiahu mixed fermented beverage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The fruits of longyan and Asiatic cornelian cherry probably grew farther north in Neolithic times when temperatures were likely milder than today.

    “The fruits of these trees, which are concentrated in southern China today, are moderately sweet and somewhat acidic. They probably grew farther north in Neolithic times when temperatures were likely milder than today.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Grape seeds of a presumed wild type constitute the primary ancient fruit remains found at Jiahu.

    “Grape possibly accounts for the tartaric acid ∕ tartrate, because grape seeds of a presumed wild type constitute the primary ancient fruit remains found at Jiahu.”
7 of 7

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. McGovern P. E. (2003) Ancient Wine: The Search for the Origins of Viniculture (Princeton Univ. Press Princeton).
  2. Vallee, B. L. (1998) Sci. Am. 278 (6), 80–85.9644011
  3. Huang, H.-T. (2000) in Science and Civilisation in China, ed. Needham, J., (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.), Vol. 6, pp. 151–153, 155–203, 232, 240–242, 247–248, and 258–282.
  4. Zhang, D. S. (1994) Zhongyuan Wenwu 3, 18–24.
  5. Guo, S. Q. (1986) Zhongyuan Wenwu 3, 94–95.
  6. Chen T. C. Tao M. & Cheng G. (1999) in Asian Foods: Science and Technology eds. Ang C. Y. W. Liu K. S. & Huang Y.-W. (Technomic Lancaster PA) pp. 383–408.
  7. Zhang, J., Harbottle, G., Wang, C. & Kong, Z. (1999) Nature 401, 366–368.
  8. Anyang Archaeological Team (2004) Kaoguxue Jikan 15, 359–390, no. M1046:2.
  9. Xu, J., Zhou, Q., Yang, H., Lin, S. & Luo, L. (1989) Sepu 7, 175–176.
  10. Merk, S., Blume, A. & Riederer, M. (1998) Planta 204, 44–53.
  11. Zhang F. Fangmei L. & Dabin G. (1990) Vitis special issue pp. 50–57.
  12. Gao, G. Y., Feng, Y. X. & Qin, X. Q. (1995) Yaoxue Xuebao 30, 138–143.
  13. Liu, F. (1989) Shipin Yu Faxiao Gongye 3, 16–29.
  14. Wang, Y., Li, L. & Sun, Y. (1991) Sepu 9, 271–272.
  15. Maeda, M. (1991) Nagasaki-ken Kôgyo Gijutsu Senta Kenkyû Hokoku 8, 112–114.
  16. Xixian, L. & Delung, W. (1986) Linye Kexue 22, 323–328.
  17. Fang X. (1989) in Zhongguo Jiu Wenhua ( Chinese Wine Culture and Famous Chinese Wines ) ed. Li Y. (China Food Beijing) pp. 3–31.
  18. Fang, X. (1942) Huanghai 4, 35–40.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,088

Metadata

Authors
McGovern, P. E., Zhang, J., Tang, J., Zhang, Z., Hall, G. R., Moreau, R. A., Nuñez, A., Butrym, E. D., Richards, M. P., Wang, C.-S., Cheng, G., Zhao, Z., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CN)
  • Museum Applied Science Center for Archaeology (MASCA), University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia, PA 19104;Department of Scientific History and Archaeometry, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China; Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100710, China; Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450000, China;Eastern Regional Research Center, U.S. Department of...
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-12-08
Volume
101
Issue
51
Pages
17593-17598
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2083669318
Cited by
1,091
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 32
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Keywords
fermented beverages, prehistoric China, Neolithic, rice, honey, fruits, hawthorn, grapes, pottery jar, Shang dynasty, Western Zhou dynasty, bronze vessels, ancient Chinese culture
MeSH terms
Archaeology, Beverages, China, Fermentation, Fruit, Honey, Oryza, Wine, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-30, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-30 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review