Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In silico study of amyloid β-protein folding and oligomerization

Open access
Urbanc, B., Cruz, L., Yun, S., Buldyrev, S. V., Bitan, G., Teplow, D. B., Stanley, H. E.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Experimental findings suggest that oligomeric forms of the amyloid β protein (Aβ) play a critical role in Alzheimer's disease. Thus, elucidating their structure and the mechanisms of their formation is critical for developing therapeutic agents. We use discrete molecular dynamics simulations and a four-bead protein model to study oligomerization of two predominant alloforms, Aβ40 and Aβ42, at the atomic level. The four-bead model incorporates backbone hydrogen-bond interactions and amino acid-specific interactions mediated through hydrophobic and hydrophilic elements of the side chains. During the simulations we observe monomer folding and aggregation of monomers into oligomers of variable sizes. Aβ40 forms significantly more dimers than Aβ42, whereas pentamers are significantly more abundant in Aβ42 relative to Aβ40. Structure analysis reveals a turn centered at Gly-37–Gly-38 that is present in a folded Aβ42 monomer but not in a folded Aβ40 monomer and is associated with the first contacts that form during monomer folding. Our results suggest that this turn plays an important role in Aβ42 pentamer formation. Aβ pentamers have a globular structure comprising hydrophobic residues within the pentamer's core and hydrophilic N-terminal residues at the surface of the pentamer. The N termini of Aβ40 pentamers are more spatially restricted than Aβ42 pentamers. Aβ40 pentamers form a β-strand structure involving Ala-2–Phe-4, which is absent in Aβ42 pentamers. These structural differences imply a different degree of hydrophobic core exposure between pentamers of the two alloforms, with the hydrophobic core of the Aβ42 pentamer being more exposed and thus more prone to form larger oligomers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0408153101

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Urbanc, B., Cruz, L., Yun, S., Buldyrev, S. V., Bitan, G., Teplow, D. B., & Stanley, H. E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-12-06
Volume
101
Issue
50
Pages
17345-17350
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2124929769
Cited by
332
References
42
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In silico study of amyloid β-protein folding and oligomerization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0408153101
The paper
Urbanc, B., Cruz, L., Yun, S., Buldyrev, S. V., Bitan, G., Teplow, D. B., & Stanley, H. E. (2004). In silico study of amyloid β-protein folding and oligomerization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408153101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.