The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polyproline and the “spectroscopic ruler” revisited with single-molecule fluorescence
Open accessAbstract
To determine whether Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements can provide quantitative distance information in single-molecule fluorescence experiments on polypeptides, we measured FRET efficiency distributions for donor and acceptor dyes attached to the ends of freely diffusing polyproline molecules of various lengths. The observed mean FRET efficiencies agree with those determined from ensemble lifetime measurements but differ considerably from the values expected from Förster theory, with polyproline treated as a rigid rod. At donor–acceptor distances much less than the Förster radius R 0 , the observed efficiencies are lower than predicted, whereas at distances comparable to and greater than R 0 , they are much higher. Two possible contributions to the former are incomplete orientational averaging during the donor lifetime and, because of the large size of the dyes, breakdown of the point-dipole approximation assumed in Förster theory. End-to-end distance distributions and correlation times obtained from Langevin molecular dynamics simulations suggest that the differences for the longer polyproline peptides can be explained by chain bending, which considerably shortens the donor–acceptor distances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Margittai, M., Widengren, J., Schweinberger, E., Schröder, G. F., Felekyan, S., Haustein, E., König, M., Fasshauer, D., Grubmüller, H., Jahn, R., et al. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2331232100 · Cited by 290
Cited by
Precision and accuracy of single-molecule FRET measurements—a multi-laboratory benchmark study
Hellenkamp, B., Schmid, S., Doroshenko, O., Opanasyuk, O., Kühnemuth, R., Rezaei Adariani, S., Ambrose, B., Aznauryan, M., Barth, A., Birkedal, V., et al. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0085-0 · Cited by 519
Self-citationShot-Noise Limited Single-Molecule FRET Histograms: Comparison between Theory and Experiments
Nir, E., Michalet, X., Hamadani, K. M., Laurence, T. A., Neuhauser, D., Kovchegov, Y., & Weiss, S. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp063483n · Cited by 314
Intramolecular Strain Coordinates Kinesin Stepping Behavior along Microtubules
Yildiz, A., Tomishige, M., Gennerich, A., & Vale, R. D. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.018 · Cited by 313
Accurate Single-Molecule FRET Studies Using Multiparameter Fluorescence Detection
Sisamakis, E., Valeri, A., Kalinin, S., Rothwell, P. J., & Seidel, C. A. M. (2010) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(10)75018-7 · Cited by 268
Internal strain regulates the nucleotide binding site of the kinesin leading head
Hyeon, C., & Onuchic, J. N. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610939104 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuler, B., Lipman, E. A., Steinbach, P. J., Kumke, M., & Eaton, W. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-02-07
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2754-2759
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2133294519
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polyproline and the “spectroscopic ruler” revisited with single-molecule fluorescence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0408164102
- The paper
- Schuler, B., Lipman, E. A., Steinbach, P. J., Kumke, M., & Eaton, W. A. (2005). Polyproline and the “spectroscopic ruler” revisited with single-molecule fluorescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408164102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.