The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ab initio simulations of protein-folding pathways by molecular dynamics with the united-residue model of polypeptide chains
Open accessAbstract
We report the application of Langevin dynamics to the physics-based united-residue (UNRES) force field developed in our laboratory. Ten trajectories were run on seven proteins [PDB ID codes 1BDD (α; 46 residues), 1GAB (α; 47 residues), 1LQ7 (α; 67 residues), 1CLB (α; 75 residues), 1E0L (β; 28 residues), and 1E0G (α+β; 48 residues), and 1IGD (α+β; 61 residues)] with the UNRES force field parameterized by using our recently developed method for obtaining a hierarchical structure of the energy landscape. All α-helical proteins and 1E0G folded to the native-like structures, whereas 1IGD and 1E0L yielded mostly nonnative α-helical folds although the native-like structures are lowest in energy for these two proteins, which can be attributed to neglecting the entropy factor in the current parameterization of UNRES. Average folding times for successful folding simulations were of the order of nanoseconds, whereas even the ultrafast-folding proteins fold only in microseconds, which implies that the UNRES time scale is approximately three orders of magnitude larger than the experimental time scale because the fast motions of the secondary degrees of freedom are averaged out. Folding with Langevin dynamics required 2–10 h of CPU time on average with a single AMD Athlon MP 2800+ processor depending on the size of the protein. With the advantage of parallel processing, this process leads to the possibility to explore thousands of folding pathways and to predict not only the native structure but also the folding scenario of a protein together with its quantitative kinetic and thermodynamic characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shea, J.-E., & Brooks III, C. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.52.1.499 · Cited by 481
Cited by
Biomolecular Modeling: Goals, Problems, Perspectives
van Gunsteren, W. F., Bakowies, D., Baron, R., Chandrasekhar, I., Christen, M., Daura, X., Gee, P., Geerke, D. P., Glättli, A., Hünenberger, P. H., et al. (2006) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200502655 · Cited by 561
Relation between Free Energy Landscapes of Proteins and Dynamics
Maisuradze, G. G., Liwo, A., & Scheraga, H. A. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct9005745 · Cited by 264
Self-citationKuang, Z., Kim, S. N., Crookes-Goodson, W. J., Farmer, B. L., & Naik, R. R. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn901365g · Cited by 184
All-Atom Ab Initio Folding of a Diverse Set of Proteins
Yang, J. S., Chen, W. W., Skolnick, J., & Shakhnovich, E. I. (2007) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2006.11.010 · Cited by 86
Greener, J. G., & Jones, D. T. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256990 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Liwo, A., Khalili, M., & Scheraga, H. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-01-26
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2362-2367
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2033570280
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ab initio simulations of protein-folding pathways by molecular dynamics with the united-residue model of polypeptide chains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0408885102
- The paper
- Liwo, A., Khalili, M., & Scheraga, H. A. (2005). Ab initio simulations of protein-folding pathways by molecular dynamics with the united-residue model of polypeptide chains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408885102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.