Cited by 86Protein Structure and DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsEnzyme Structure and Function

All-Atom Ab Initio Folding of a Diverse Set of Proteins

Open access
Yang, Jae Shick, Chen, William W., Skolnick, Jeffrey, Shakhnovich, Eugene I.·2007·Structure

Abstract

Natural proteins fold to a unique, thermodynamically dominant state. Modeling of the folding process and prediction of the native fold of proteins are two major unsolved problems in biophysics. Here, we show successful all-atom ab initio folding of a representative diverse set of proteins by using a minimalist transferable-energy model that consists of two-body atom-atom interactions, hydrogen bonding, and a local sequence-energy term that models sequence-specific chain stiffness. Starting from a random coil, the native-like structure was observed during replica exchange Monte Carlo (REMC) simulation for most proteins regardless of their structural classes; the lowest energy structure was close to native-in the range of 2-6 A root-mean-square deviation (rmsd). Our results demonstrate that the successful folding of a protein chain to its native state is governed by only a few crucial energetic terms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2006.11.010

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The small 5-10 kcal/mol difference in stability between native and denatured states compounded the challenge for protein structure prediction methods.

    “The small (5–10 kcal/mol) difference in the stability of the native structures as compared to the denatured states151 compounded the challenge that predicting methods faced.”

    From AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery (2022) · cites this paper as [151]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, J. S., Chen, W. W., Skolnick, J., & Shakhnovich, E. I.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Shakhnovich, Eugene I.
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
53-63
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990700294
Cited by
86
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein folding, hydrogen bonding, parallel tempering, native structure prediction, random coil
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Monte Carlo Method, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review