Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proteome-scale purification of human proteins from bacteria

Open access
Braun, Pascal, Hu, Yanhui, Shen, Binghua, Halleck, Allison, Koundinya, Malvika, Harlow, Ed, LaBaer, Joshua·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The completion of the human genome project and the development of high-throughput approaches herald a dramatic acceleration in the pace of biological research. One of the most compelling next steps will be learning the functional roles of all proteins. Achievement of this goal depends in part on the rapid expression and isolation of proteins at large scale. We exploited recombinational cloning to facilitate the development of methods for the high-throughput purification of human proteins. cDNAs were introduced into a master vector from which they could be rapidly transferred into a variety of protein expression vectors for further analysis. A test set of 32 sequence-verified human cDNAs of various sizes and activities was moved into four different expression vectors encoding different affinity-purification tags. By means of an automatable 2-hr protein purification procedure, all 128 proteins were purified and subsequently characterized for yield, purity, and steps at which losses occurred. Under denaturing conditions when the His 6 tag was used, 84% of samples were purified. Under nondenaturing conditions, both the glutathione S -transferase and maltose-binding protein tags were successful in 81% of samples. The developed methods were applied to a larger set of 336 randomly selected cDNAs. Sixty percent of these proteins were successfully purified under denaturing conditions and 82% of these under nondenaturing conditions. A relational database, FLEXProt, was built to compare properties of proteins that were successfully purified and proteins that were not. We observed that some domains in the Pfam database were found almost exclusively in proteins that were successfully purified and thus may have predictive character.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.042684199

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00093-X · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.289.5485.1760 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1073/pnas.96.16.8825 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0076-6879(00)28419-X · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0166-6851(01)00366-8 · DOI
  6. 10.1101/gr.143000 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1006/prep.1997.0767 · DOI · Paper page
  8. R C Stevens, S Yokoyama, I A Wilson Protein Sci 294, 89–92 (2001).
  9. E Harlow, D Lane Using Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY, 1999).
  10. 10.1101/gad.12.4.456 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/nar/28.1.263 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S0076-6879(00)26058-8 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/S0076-6879(00)26064-3 · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(00)26064-3
  14. 10.1016/S0076-6879(00)26059-X · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(00)26059-x
  15. 10.1016/S0076-6879(00)26062-X · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0167-7799(94)90021-3 · doi:10.1016/0167-7799(94)90021-3
  17. 10.1128/aem.61.4.1220-1225.1995 · doi:10.1128/aem.61.4.1220-1225.1995
  18. 10.1016/S0958-1669(98)80035-9 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1006/prep.1997.0759 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1002/1097-4644(20010201)80:2<187::AID-JCB40>3.0.CO;2-V · doi:10.1002/1097-4644(20010201)80:2<187::aid-jcb40>3.0.co;2-v
  21. 10.1038/82823 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/pro.5560040509 · DOI
  23. 10.1006/prep.1996.0018 · DOI
  24. 10.1110/ps.8.8.1668 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Braun, P., Hu, Y., Shen, B., Halleck, A., Koundinya, M., Harlow, E., & LaBaer, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-03-05
Volume
99
Issue
5
Pages
2654-2659
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2102351705
Cited by
265
References
2
FWCI
11.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteome-scale purification of human proteins from bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.042684199
The paper
Braun, P., Hu, Y., Shen, B., Halleck, A., Koundinya, M., Harlow, E., & LaBaer, J. (2002). Proteome-scale purification of human proteins from bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.042684199

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.