Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 456

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The response of autologous T cells to a human melanoma is dominated by mutated neoantigens

Open access
Lennerz, Volker, Fatho, Martina, Gentilini, Chiara, Frye, Roy A., Lifke, Alexander, Ferel, Dorothea, Wölfel, Catherine, Huber, Christoph, Wölfel, Thomas·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Our understanding of pathways leading to antitumor immunity may depend on an undistorted knowledge of the primary antigenic targets of patients' autologous T cell responses. In the melanoma model derived from patient DT, we applied cryopreserved short-term autologous mixed lymphocyte–tumor cell cultures (MLTCs) in combination with an IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay to cDNA expression screening. We identified three previously unknown peptides processed from melanosomal proteins tyrosinase (presented by HLA-A*2601 and -B*3801) and gp100 (presented by HLA-B*07021) and five neoantigens generated by somatic point mutations in the patient's melanoma. The mutations were found in the genes SIRT2, GPNMB, SNRP116, SNRPD1, and RBAF600. Peptides containing the mutated residues were presented by HLA-A*03011, -B*07021, and -B*3801. Mutation-induced functional impairment was so far demonstrated for SIRT2. Within MLTC responder populations that were independently expanded from the patient's peripheral blood lymphocytes of different years, T cells against mutated epitopes clearly predominated. These results document a high degree of individuality for the cellular antitumor response and support the need for individualizing the monitoring and therapeutic approaches to the primary targets of the autologous T cell response, which may finally lead to a more effective cancer immunotherapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0500090102

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 456

Metadata

Authors
Lennerz, V., Fatho, M., Gentilini, C., Frye, R. A., Lifke, A., Ferel, D., Wölfel, C., Huber, C., & Wölfel, T.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-10-24
Volume
102
Issue
44
Pages
16013-16018
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1987288591
Cited by
456
References
3
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The response of autologous T cells to a human melanoma is dominated by mutated neoantigens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0500090102
The paper
Lennerz, V., Fatho, M., Gentilini, C., Frye, R. A., Lifke, A., Ferel, D., Wölfel, C., Huber, C., & Wölfel, T. (2005). The response of autologous T cells to a human melanoma is dominated by mutated neoantigens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500090102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.