The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gain-of-function amino acid substitutions drive positive selection of FGFR2 mutations in human spermatogonia
Open accessAbstract
Despite the importance of mutation in genetics, there are virtually no experimental data on the occurrence of specific nucleotide substitutions in human gametes. C>G transversions at position 755 of FGF receptor 2 ( FGFR2 ) cause Apert syndrome; this mutation, encoding the gain-of-function substitution Ser252Trp, occurs with a birth rate elevated 200- to 800-fold above background and originates exclusively from the unaffected father. We previously demonstrated high levels of both 755C>G and 755C>T FGFR2 mutations in human sperm and proposed that these particular mutations are enriched because the encoded proteins confer a selective advantage to spermatogonial cells. Here, we examine three corollaries of this hypothesis. First, we show that mutation levels at the adjacent FGFR2 nucleotides 752-754 are low, excluding any general increase in local mutation rate. Second, we present three instances of double-nucleotide changes involving 755C, expected to be extremely rare as chance events. Two of these double-nucleotide substitutions are shown, either by assessment of the pedigree or by direct analysis of sperm, to have arisen in sequential steps; the third (encoding Ser252Tyr) was predicted from structural considerations. Finally, we demonstrate that both major alternative spliceforms of FGFR2 ( Fgfr2b and Fgfr2c ) are expressed in rat spermatogonial stem cell lines. Taken together, these observations show that specific FGFR2 mutations attain high levels in sperm because they encode proteins with gain-of-function properties, favoring clonal expansion of mutant spermatogonial cells. Among FGFR2 mutations, those causing Apert syndrome may be especially prevalent because they enhance signaling by FGF ligands specific for each of the major expressed isoforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Nearly all Apert syndrome mutations arise de novo, and have been shown to originate exclusively from the father.”
From Craniosynostosis (2011) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This is because the vast majority of cases arise from mutations occurring in adult spermatogonia, which although subject to strong positive selection never populate large proportions of the sperm.15,16”
From Craniosynostosis (2011) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These mutations provide a paradigm for paternal age effect mutations that are enriched in sperm owing to a paradoxical selective advantage to mutant spermatogonial cells in the testis.15,16”
From Craniosynostosis (2011) · cites this paper as [15]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In the case of FGF receptor mutations, provided that the blood of both parents is negative for the mutation, the recurrence risk is very low (well under 1%).”
From Craniosynostosis (2011) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptor Specificity of the Fibroblast Growth Factor Family
Ornitz, D. M., Xu, J., Colvin, J. S., McEwen, D. G., MacArthur, C. A., Coulier, F., Gao, G., & Goldfarb, M. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.25.15292 · Cited by 1,871
Clonal selection and learning in the antibody system
Rajewsky, K. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381751a0 · Cited by 1,701
Estimate of the Mutation Rate per Nucleotide in Humans
Nachman, M. W., & Crowell, S. L. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/156.1.297 · Cited by 1,226
Growth factors essential for self-renewal and expansion of mouse spermatogonial stem cells
KUBOTA, H. Y., Avarbock, M. R., & Brinster, R. L. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0407063101 · Cited by 975
Apert syndrome results from localized mutations of FGFR2 and is allelic with Crouzon syndrome
Wilkie, A. O. M., Slaney, S. F., Oldridge, M., Poole, M. D., Ashworth, G. J., Hockley, A. D., Hayward, R. D., David, D. J., Pulleyn, L. J., Rutland, P., et al. (1995) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0295-165 · Cited by 935
Self-citationThe origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation
Crow, J. F. (2000) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35049558 · Cited by 928
Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands
Potten, C. S., Owen, G., & Booth, D. (2002) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.115.11.2381 · Cited by 633
Penrose, L. S. (1955) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(55)92305-9 · Cited by 348
Isolation of male germ-line stem cells; influence of GDNF
Hofmann, M.-C. C., Braydich‐Stolle, L. K., & Dym, M. (2005) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.12.006 · Cited by 338
Direct estimates of human per nucleotide mutation rates at 20 loci causing mendelian diseases
Kondrashov, A. S. (2002) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.10147 · Cited by 336
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Hurst, L. D. (2003) in Nature Encyclopaedia of the Human Genome, ed. Cooper, D. N. (Nature Publishing Group, London), Vol. 4, pp. 218-222.
- Carlson, K. M., Bracamontes, J., Jackson, C. E., Clark, R., Lacroix, A., Wells, S. A., Jr., & Goodfellow, P. J. (1994) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 55, 1076-1082.7977365
- Schuffenecker, I., Ginet, N., Goldgar, D., Eng, C., Chambe, B., Boneu, A., Houdent, C., Pallo, D., Schlumberger, M., Thivolet, C., et al. (1997) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60, 233-237.8981969
- Risch, N., Reich, E. W., Wishnick, M. M. & McCarthy, J. G. (1987) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 41, 218-248.3618593
- Weinberg, W. (1912) Arch. Rassen Gesel. Biol. 9, 710-717.
- Penrose, L. S. (1955) Lancet 269, 312-313.13243724
- Kondrashov, A. S. (2002) Hum. Mutat. 21, 12-27.
- Merok, J. R., Lansita, J. A., Tunstead, J. R. & Sherley, J. L. (2002) Cancer Res. 62, 6791-6795.12460886
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Horton, W. A., Hall, J. G., & Hecht, J. T. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61090-3 · Cited by 604
Johnson, D., & Wilkie, A. O. M. (2011) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2010.235 · Cited by 499
Self-citationFibroblast growth factor signaling in skeletal development and diseasePreprint
Ornitz, D. M., & Marie, P. J. (2015) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.266551.115 · Cited by 419
Wyrobek, A. J., Eskenazi, B., Young, S., Arnheim, N., Tiemann‐Boege, I., Jabs, E. W., Glaser, R. L., Pearson, F. S., & Evenson, D. P. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506468103 · Cited by 402
Goriely, A., & Wilkie, A. O. M. (2012) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.12.017 · Cited by 365
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Goriely, A., McVean, G. A. T., van Pelt, A. M. M., O'Rourke, A. W., Wall, S. A., de Rooij, D. G., & Wilkie, A. O. M.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom; Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom; Department of Endocrinology, Utrecht University, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Oxford Regional Genetics Laboratories, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom; Department of Plastic Surgery, Craniofacial Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, United Kingdom; and...
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-04-19
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6051-6056
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1975823415
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 11.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- FGFR2, Apert syndrome, gain-of-function mutations, spermatogonia, clonal expansion, FGFR2b, FGF signaling, positive selection, spermatogonial stem cells
- MeSH terms
- Acrocephalosyndactylia, Base Sequence, Genetic Carrier Screening, Humans, Male, Spermatogonia, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor, DNA Primers, Amino Acid Substitution, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
