The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synonymous mutations in CFTR exon 12 affect splicing and are not neutral in evolution
Open accessAbstract
It is well established that exonic sequences contain regulatory elements of splicing that overlap with coding capacity. However, the conflict between ensuring splicing efficiency and preserving the coding capacity for an optimal protein during evolution has not been specifically analyzed. In fact, studies on genomic variability in fields as diverse as clinical genetics and molecular evolution mainly focus on the effect of mutations on protein function. Synonymous variations, in particular, are assumed to be functionally neutral both in clinical diagnosis and when measuring evolutionary distances between species. Using the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) exon 12 splicing as a model, we have established that about one quarter of synonymous variations result in exon skipping and, hence, in an inactive CFTR protein. Furthermore, comparative splicing evaluation of mammalian sequence divergences showed that artificial combinations of CFTR exon 12 synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions are incompatible with normal RNA processing. In particular, the combination of the mouse synonymous with the human missense variations causes exon skipping. It follows that there are two sequential levels at which evolutionary selection of genomic variants take place: splicing control and protein function optimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Listening to silence and understanding nonsense: exonic mutations that affect splicing
Cartegni, L., Chew, S. L., & Krainer, A. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg775 · Cited by 2,209
Alternative splicing in disease and therapy
Garcia-Blanco, M. A., Baraniak, A. P., & Lasda, E. L. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt964 · Cited by 527
Cited by
Cooper, T. A., Wan, L., & Dreyfuss, G. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.011 · Cited by 1,159
Splicing in disease: disruption of the splicing code and the decoding machinery
Wang, G.-S., & Cooper, T. A. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2164 · Cited by 1,050
Understanding the contribution of synonymous mutations to human disease
Sauna, Z. E., & Kimchi-Sarfaty, C. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3051 · Cited by 1,022
Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals
Chamary, J. V., Parmley, J. L., & Hurst, L. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1770 · Cited by 831
High Guanine and Cytosine Content Increases mRNA Levels in Mammalian Cells
Kudla, G., Lipinski, L., Caffin, F., Helwak, A., & Zylicz, M. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040180 · Cited by 476
Metadata
- Authors
- Pagani, F., Raponi, M., & Baralle, F. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-04-19
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 6368-6372
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2000364429
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synonymous mutations in CFTR exon 12 affect splicing and are not neutral in evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0502288102
- The paper
- Pagani, F., Raponi, M., & Baralle, F. E. (2005). Synonymous mutations in CFTR exon 12 affect splicing and are not neutral in evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502288102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.