The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of the placental epigenetic signature of the maspin gene in maternal plasma
Open accessAbstract
The discovery of fetal DNA in the plasma of pregnant women has opened up new approaches for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis and monitoring. Up to now, the lack of a fetal DNA marker that can be universally detected in maternal plasma has limited the clinical application of this technology. We hypothesized that epigenetic differences between the placenta and maternal blood cells could be used for developing such a marker. By using bisulfite DNA sequencing, the methylation status of the maspin gene promoter in placental tissues and paired maternal blood cells from pregnant women was analyzed. The maspin gene promoter was found to be hypomethylated in placental tissues and densely methylated in maternal blood cells. Genotyping of a single nucleotide polymorphism within the unmethylated maspin sequences in maternal plasma demonstrated that these sequences were derived from the fetus. By using real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR, unmethylated maspin sequences were detected in maternal plasma in all three trimesters of pregnancy and were cleared within 24 h after delivery. The maternal plasma concentration of unmethylated maspin sequences was elevated by a median of 5.7 times in preeclamptic pregnancies compared with nonpreeclamptic pregnancies. Hypomethylated maspin DNA is the first universal marker for fetal DNA in maternal plasma, thus allowing the measurement of fetal DNA concentrations in pregnancy-associated disorders, irrespective of fetal gender and genetic polymorphisms. Differential DNA methylation between the placenta and maternal blood cells may be exploited to develop further markers for noninvasive prenatal assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Disorders of sex development: a new definition and classification
Hughes, I. A. (2008) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2007.11.001 · Cited by 438
Lun, F. M. F., Tsui, N. B. Y., Chan, K. C. A., Leung, T. Y., Lau, T. K., Charoenkwan, P., Chow, K. C. K., Lo, W. Y. W., Wanapirak, C., Sanguansermsri, T., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0810373105 · Cited by 355
Self-citationTsang, J. C. H., Vong, J. S. L., Ji, L., Poon, L. C. Y., Jiang, P., Lui, K. O., Ni, Y.-B., To, K. F., Cheng, Y. K. Y., Chiu, R. W. K., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1710470114 · Cited by 328
Self-citationPotential markers of preeclampsia – a review
Grill, S., Rusterholz, C., Zanetti-Dällenbach, R., Tercanli, S., Holzgreve, W., Hahn, S., & Lapaire, O. (2009) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/1477-7827-7-70 · Cited by 293
The use of cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
Wright, C. F., & Burton, H. (2008) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn047 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Chim, S. S. C., Tong, Y. K., Chiu, R. W. K., Lau, T. K., Leung, T. N., Chan, L. Y. S., Oudejans, C. B. M., Ding, C., & Lo, Y. M. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-10-03
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 14753-14758
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2071428826
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of the placental epigenetic signature of the maspin gene in maternal plasma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0503335102
- The paper
- Chim, S. S. C., Tong, Y. K., Chiu, R. W. K., Lau, T. K., Leung, T. N., Chan, L. Y. S., Oudejans, C. B. M., Ding, C., & Lo, Y. M. D. (2005). Detection of the placental epigenetic signature of the maspin gene in maternal plasma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503335102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.