The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Isoforms of ΔNp63 and the migration of ocular limbal cells in human corneal regeneration
Open accessAbstract
The p63 gene generates transactivating and N-terminally truncated transcripts (ΔNp63) initiated by different promoters. Alternative splicing gives rise to three different C termini, designated α, β, and γ. In the ocular epithelium, the corneal stem cells, which are segregated in the basal layer of the limbus, contain the α isoform but not β or γ. Holoclones derived from the limbus are rich in α, meroclones contain little, and paraclones contain none. In normal resting corneal epithelium, p63 of all isoforms is absent. Upon corneal wounding, cells originating from the limbus and containing α migrate progressively through the epithelium of the peripheral and central cornea. In the absence of an attached limbus, no α isoform appears in the corneal epithelium. When migrating cells containing the α isoform appear in the wounded corneal epithelium, they are confined to the basal layer, but the suprabasal cells, not only of the cornea but of the limbus as well, contain mRNA encoding β and γ. These data support the concept that the α isoform of p63 is necessary for the maintenance of the proliferative potential of limbal stem cells and their ability to migrate over the cornea. The β and γ isoforms, being suprabasal and virtually absent from the resting limbus, are not stem cell markers but are likely to play a role in epithelial differentiation specifically during the process of corneal regeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blanpain, C., Lowry, W. E., Geoghegan, A., Polak, L., & Fuchs, E. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.012 · Cited by 1,428
Cited by
p63 protects the female germ line during meiotic arrest
Suh, E.-K., Yang, A., Kettenbach, A., Bamberger, C., Michaelis, A. H., Zhu, Z., Elvin, J. A., Bronson, R. T., Crum, C. P., & McKeon, F. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05337 · Cited by 549
Oligopotent stem cells are distributed throughout the mammalian ocular surface
Majo, F., Rochat, A., Nicolas, M., Jaoudé, G. A., & Barrandon, Y. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07406 · Cited by 441
Niche regulation of corneal epithelial stem cells at the limbus
Li, W., Hayashida, Y., Chen, Y.-T., & Tseng, S. C. (2007) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/sj.cr.7310137 · Cited by 310
Shortt, A. J., Secker, G. A., Munro, P. M., Khaw, P. T., Tuft, S. J., & Daniels, J. T. (2007) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2006-0580 · Cited by 310
Pathophysiology of aniridia-associated keratopathy: Developmental aspects and unanswered questions
Latta, L., Figueiredo, F. C., Ashery-Padan, R., Collinson, J. M., Daniels, J., Ferrari, S., Szentmáry, N., Solá, S., Shalom-Feuerstein, R., Lako, M., et al. (2021) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2021.09.001 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Di Iorio, E., Barbaro, V., Ruzza, A., Ponzin, D., Pellegrini, G., & De Luca, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-06-27
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 9523-9528
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2091580452
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isoforms of ΔNp63 and the migration of ocular limbal cells in human corneal regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0503437102
- The paper
- Di Iorio, E., Barbaro, V., Ruzza, A., Ponzin, D., Pellegrini, G., & De Luca, M. (2005). Isoforms of ΔNp63 and the migration of ocular limbal cells in human corneal regeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503437102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.