The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced antiinflammatory capacity of a Lactobacillus plantarum mutant synthesizing modified teichoic acids
Open accessAbstract
Teichoic acids (TAs), and especially lipoteichoic acids (LTAs), are one of the main immunostimulatory components of pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria. Their contribution to the immunomodulatory properties of commensal bacteria and especially of lactic acid bacteria has not yet been investigated in detail. To evaluate the role of TAs in the interaction between lactic acid bacteria and the immune system, we analyzed the antiinflammatory properties of a mutant of Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB8826 affected in the TA biosynthesis pathway both in vitro (mononuclear cells stimulation) and in vivo (murine model of colitis). This Dlt - mutant was found to incorporate much less d -Ala in its TAs than the WT strain. This defect significantly impacted the immunomodulation reactions induced by the bacterium, as shown by a dramatically reduced secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclear cells and monocytes stimulated by the Dlt - mutant as compared with the parental strain. Concomitantly, a significant increase in IL-10 production was stimulated by the Dlt - mutant in comparison with the WT strain. Moreover, the proinflammatory capacity of L. plantarum -purified LTA was found to be Toll-like receptor 2-dependent. Consistent with the in vitro results, the Dlt - mutant was significantly more protective in a murine colitis model than its WT counterpart. The results indicated that composition of LTA within the whole-cell context of L. plantarum can modulate proinflammatory or antiinflammatory immune responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The indigenous gastrointestinal microflora
Berg, R. (1996) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/0966-842x(96)10057-3 · Cited by 1,153
Cited by
The gut flora as a forgotten organ
O'Hara, A. M., & Shanahan, F. (2006) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400731 · Cited by 2,791
Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens
Lebeer, S., Vanderleyden, J., & De Keersmaecker, S. C. J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2297 · Cited by 1,062
Genes and Molecules of Lactobacilli Supporting Probiotic Action
Lebeer, S., Vanderleyden, J., & De Keersmaecker, S. C. J. (2008) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00017-08 · Cited by 1,013
Probiotics Mechanism of Action on Immune Cells and Beneficial Effects on Human Health
Mazziotta, C., Tognon, M., Martini, F., Torreggiani, E., & Rotondo, J. C. (2023) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells12010184 · Cited by 889
Kankainen, M., Paulin, L., Tynkkynen, S., von Ossowski, I., Reunanen, J., Partanen, P., Satokari, R., Vesterlund, S., Hendrickx, A. P. A., Lebeer, S., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0908876106 · Cited by 740
Metadata
- Authors
- Grangette, C., Nutten, S., Palumbo, E., Morath, S., Hermann, C., Dewulf, J., Pot, B., Hartung, T., Hols, P., & Mercenier, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-06-28
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 10321-10326
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1922734004
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced antiinflammatory capacity of a Lactobacillus plantarum mutant synthesizing modified teichoic acids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0504084102
- The paper
- Grangette, C., Nutten, S., Palumbo, E., Morath, S., Hermann, C., Dewulf, J., Pot, B., Hartung, T., Hols, P., & Mercenier, A. (2005). Enhanced antiinflammatory capacity of a Lactobacillus plantarum mutant synthesizing modified teichoic acids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504084102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.