The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning improves growth rate in grasshoppers
Open accessAbstract
To quantify the adaptive significance of insect learning, we documented the behavior and growth rate of grasshoppers ( Schistocerca americana ) in an environment containing two artificial food types, one providing a balanced diet of protein and carbohydrate, which maximizes growth, and the other being carbohydrate-deficient, which is unsuitable for growth. Grasshoppers in the Learning treatment experienced a predictable environment, where the spatial location, taste, and color of each food source remained constant throughout the experiment. In contrast, grasshoppers of the Random treatment developed in a temporally varying environment, where the spatial location, taste, and color of the balanced and deficient food types randomly alternated twice each day. Our results show that the grasshoppers that could employ associative learning for diet choice experienced higher growth rates than individuals of the Random treatment, demonstrating the adaptive significance of learning in a small short-lived insect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Integrative models of nutrient balancing: application to insects and vertebrates
Raubenheimer, D., & Simpson, S. J. (1997) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/nrr19970009 · Cited by 454
Cited by
Phenotypic Plasticity in the Interactions and Evolution of Species
Agrawal, A. A. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060701 · Cited by 1,630
Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments
Sol, D., Duncan, R. P., Blackburn, T. M., Cassey, P., & Lefebvre, L. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408145102 · Cited by 913
Foraging Adaptation and the Relationship Between Food-Web Complexity and Stability
Kondoh, M. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1079154 · Cited by 707
The evolution of growth trajectories: what limits growth rate?
Dmitriew, C. M. (2011) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00136.x · Cited by 599
Evolutionary Biology of Insect Learning
Dukas, R. (2008) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093343 · Cited by 451
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dukas, R., & Bernays, E. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-03-07
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2637-2640
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2155747457
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning improves growth rate in grasshoppers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.050461497
- The paper
- Dukas, R., & Bernays, E. A. (2000). Learning improves growth rate in grasshoppers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.050461497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.