Cited by 454Animal Nutrition and PhysiologyRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

Integrative models of nutrient balancing: application to insects and vertebrates

Open access
Raubenheimer, D., Simpson, S. J.·1997·Nutrition Research Reviews

Abstract

We present and apply to data for insects, chickens and rats a conceptual and experimental framework for studying nutrition as a multi-dimensional phenomenon. The framework enables the unification within a single geometrical model of several nutritionally relevant measures, including: the optimal balance and amounts of nutrients required by an animal in a given time (the intake target), the animal's current state in relation to these requirements, available foods, the amounts of ingested nutrients which are retained and eliminated, and animal performance. Animals given a nutritionally balanced food, or two or more imbalanced but complementary foods, can satisfy their nutrient requirements, and hence optimize performance. However, animals eating noncomplementary imbalanced foods must decide on a suitable compromise between overingesting some nutrients and underingesting others. The geometrical models provide a means of measuring nutritional targets and rules of compromise, and comparing these among different animals and within similar animals at different developmental stages or in different environments. They also provide a framework for designing and interpreting experiments on the regulatory and metabolic mechanisms underlying nutritional homeostasis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/nrr19970009

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many species tend to regulate the macronutrient composition of their diet to a target macronutrient ratio.

    “Notwithstanding, in the last two decades, a growing body of evidence has outlined that foraging is not exclusively driven by energy acquisition and many species tend to regulate the macronutrient composition (percentage of caloric intake of protein, lipids and carbohydrates, P:L:C) of their diet to a target macronutrient ratio (“intake target”)7–9.”

    From Nutritional ecology of a prototypical generalist predator, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

    The ‘Identifying intake requirements’ section describes animals regulating nutrient intake toward a target and gives protein–carbohydrate examples in locusts, rats and chickens. The passages support the general idea of macronutrient intake targets, but do not establish regulation of a three-way protein–lipid–carbohydrate ratio expressed as percentages of caloric intake. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The macronutrient composition of the diet affects fundamental fitness-related traits including growth, fecundity and lifespan.

    “As the macronutrient composition of the diet has been demonstrated to affect many fundamental fitness-related traits, including growth7,10, fecundity11 and lifespan12,13, we may expect that, for any species, suitable habitats are those which offer food resources capable of satisfying the nutritional requirements of a number of individuals in all the phases of their life cycle.”
  • Several studies using the geometric framework suggest that animals eat to a carbohydrate target.

    “several studies suggest that animals eat to a carbohydrate target”
  • Studies using the geometric framework generally observe either a very weak or nonexistent regulation of fat intake, and fat acts to dilute protein and carbohydrate and thus increase intake.

    “the studies using the geometric framework generally observe either a very weak or nonexistent regulation of fat intake, and as a result, fat acts to dilute protein and carbohydrate and thus increase intake”
  • Nutritional geometry studies strongly argue that a number of species defend protein intake, eat to a protein target, and prioritize protein over fat or carbohydrate intake.

    “These data strongly argue that a number of species defend protein intake, eat to a protein target, and prioritize protein over fat or carbohydrate intake”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Armsby. H. P. & Fries, J. A. (1915). Net energy values of feeding stuffs for cattle. Journal ofAgriculrural Research Ill. 4 3 5 4 9
  2. Friggens. N. C., Hay, D. E. F. & Oldham. J. D. (1993). Interactions between major nutrients in the diet and the Hughes. R. N. (1993). Introduction. In Diet Selection: an interdisciplinary approach toforaging behaviour. pp. 1-9 [
  3. R. N. Hughes, editor]. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. secondary compounds associated with low levels of dietary proteins. Journal of Insect Behaviour 4, 545-556. migratoria: the interaction between food nutrients and added flavours. Physiological Entomology, in press. rnigratoria nymphs. Animal Eehaviour 50, 15 13-1 523. grasshopper Schisrocerca americana. Physiological Entomology 16, 39 1400. Applicata 56. 47-60. 50.59-64. lactational performance of rats. Brirish Journal of Nutrition 69, 59-7 1.
  4. N. Hughes, editor]. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. colouration of nymphs of the desert locust, Schisrocerca gregaria. J o u m l of Insect Physiology 40, 173-181. intake in female and male rats from weaning to maturity. Physiology & Eehaviour 50. 1 167-1 174. and energy. Journal of Nurririon 104, 563-572.
  5. Stephens, D; W. & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raubenheimer, D., & Simpson, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Nutrition Research Reviews
Published
1997-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
151-179
ISSN
  • 0954-4224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2700
OpenAlex
W1971950425
Cited by
454
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
nutrient balance, nutritional homeostasis, geometric model, nutrient requirements, nutrient intake, nutrient retention, animal performance, chickens, rats, insects, developmental stages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review