The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A structural model for unfolded proteins from residual dipolar couplings and small-angle x-ray scattering
Open accessAbstract
Natively unfolded proteins play key roles in normal and pathological biochemical processes. Despite their importance for function, this category of proteins remains beyond the reach of classical structural biology because of their inherent conformational heterogeneity. We present a description of the intrinsic conformational sampling of unfolded proteins based on residue-specific φ/Ψ propensities from loop regions of a folded protein database and simple volume exclusion. This approach is used to propose a structural model of the 57-aa, natively disordered region of the nucleocapsid-binding domain of Sendai virus phosphoprotein. Structural ensembles obeying these simple rules of conformational sampling are used to simulate averaged residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) and small-angle x-ray scattering data. This protein is particularly informative because RDC data from the equally sized folded and unfolded domains both report on the unstructured region, allowing a quantitative analysis of the degree of order present in this part of the protein. Close agreement between experimental and simulated RDC and small-angle x-ray scattering data validates this simple model of conformational sampling, providing a precise description of local structure and dynamics and average dimensions of the ensemble of sampled structures. RDC data from two urea-unfolded systems are also closely reproduced. The demonstration that conformational behavior of unfolded proteins can be accurately predicted from the primary sequence by using a simple set of rules has important consequences for our understanding of the structure and dynamics of the unstructured state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions
Dyson, H. J., & Wright, P. E. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1589 · Cited by 3,871
Intrinsic Disorder and Protein Function
Dunker, A. K., Brown, C. J., Lawson, J. D., Iakoucheva, L. M., & Obradović, Z. (2002) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi012159+ · Cited by 1,731
Influence of proline residues on protein conformation
MacArthur, M. W., & Thornton, J. M. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)90721-h · Cited by 1,189
Cited by
The ensemble nature of allostery
Motlagh, H. N., Wrabl, J. O., Li, J., & Hilser, V. J. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13001 · Cited by 1,247
Putnam, C. D., Hammel, M., Hura, G. L., & Tainer, J. A. (2007) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583507004635 · Cited by 1,184
Wei, G., Xi, W., Nussinov, R., & Ma, B. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00562 · Cited by 436
Casein and casein micelle structures, functions and diversity in 20 species.
Holt, C. (2016) · International Dairy Journal · doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2016.01.004 · Cited by 95
Lindorff-Larsen, K., & Kragelund, B. B. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167196 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernadó, P., Blanchard, L., Timmins, P., Marion, D., Ruigrok, R. W. H., & Blackledge, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-11-11
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 17002-17007
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2058238447
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A structural model for unfolded proteins from residual dipolar couplings and small-angle x-ray scattering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0506202102
- The paper
- Bernadó, P., Blanchard, L., Timmins, P., Marion, D., Ruigrok, R. W. H., & Blackledge, M. (2005). A structural model for unfolded proteins from residual dipolar couplings and small-angle x-ray scattering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506202102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.