The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A gain-control theory of binocular combination
Open accessAbstract
In binocular combination, light images on the two retinas are combined to form a single “cyclopean” perceptual image, in contrast to binocular rivalry which occurs when the two eyes have incompatible (“rivalrous”) inputs and only one eye`s stimulus is perceived. We propose a computational theory for binocular combination with two basic principles of interaction: in every spatial neighborhood, each eye ( i ) exerts gain control on the other eye's signal in proportion to the contrast energy of its own input and ( ii ) additionally exerts gain control on the other eye's gain control. For stimuli of ordinary contrast, when either eye is stimulated alone, the predicted cyclopean image is the same as when both eyes are stimulated equally, coinciding with an easily observed property of natural vision. The gain-control theory is contrast dependent: Very low-contrast stimuli to the left- and right-eye add linearly to form the predicted cyclopean image. The intrinsic nonlinearity manifests itself only as contrast increases. To test the theory more precisely, a horizontal sine wave grating of 0.68 cycles per degree is presented to each eye. The gratings differ in contrast and phase. The predicted (and perceived) cyclopean grating also is a sine wave; its apparent phase indicates the relative contribution of the two eyes to the cyclopean image. For 48 measured combinations of phase and contrast, the theory with only one estimated parameter accounts for 95% of the variance of the data. Therefore, a simple, robust, physiologically plausible gain-control theory accurately describes an early stage of binocular combination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chalupa, L. M., Werner, J. S., & Barnstable, C. J. (2004) · Cited by 1,029
Levelt, W. J. M. (1968) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 809
Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision
Wilson, H. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2333622100 · Cited by 411
BINOCULAR BRIGHTNESS AVERAGING AND CONTOUR INFORMATION
Levelt, W. J. M. (1965) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1965.tb00939.x · Cited by 136
Binocular interactions in suprathreshold contrast perception
Legge, G. E., & Rubin, G. S. (1981) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206136 · Cited by 135
Neural dynamics of binocular brightness perception
Grossberg, S., & Kelly, F. (1999) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00095-4 · Cited by 85
Cited by
Shao, F., Li, K., Lin, W., Jiang, G., Yu, M., & Dai, Q. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2015.2436332 · Cited by 116
Can binocular rivalry reveal neural correlates of consciousness?
Blake, R., Brascamp, J., & Heeger, D. J. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0211 · Cited by 112
Correction of presbyopia: old problems with old (and new) solutions
Kollbaum, P. S., & Bradley, A. (2020) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/cxo.12987 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, J., & Sperling, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-01-12
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1141-1146
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2064875844
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A gain-control theory of binocular combination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0509629103
- The paper
- Ding, J., & Sperling, G. (2006). A gain-control theory of binocular combination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509629103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.