Cited by 116Image and Video Quality AssessmentImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesDigital Media Forensic Detection

Full-Reference Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Images by Learning Binocular Receptive Field Properties

Shao, Feng, Li, Kemeng, Lin, Weisi, Jiang, Gangyi, Yu, Mei, Dai, Qionghai·2015·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

Quality assessment of 3D images encounters more challenges than its 2D counterparts. Directly applying 2D image quality metrics is not the solution. In this paper, we propose a new full-reference quality assessment for stereoscopic images by learning binocular receptive field properties to be more in line with human visual perception. To be more specific, in the training phase, we learn a multiscale dictionary from the training database, so that the latent structure of images can be represented as a set of basis vectors. In the quality estimation phase, we compute sparse feature similarity index based on the estimated sparse coefficient vectors by considering their phase difference and amplitude difference, and compute global luminance similarity index by considering luminance changes. The final quality score is obtained by incorporating binocular combination based on sparse energy and sparse complexity. Experimental results on five public 3D image quality assessment databases demonstrate that in comparison with the most related existing methods, the devised algorithm achieves high consistency with subjective assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2015.2436332

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shao et al. proposed a new full-reference quality assessment model for stereoscopic images where binocular receptive field properties are learned and aligned with human visual perception.

    “A new full-reference quality assessment model for stereoscopic images is proposed by Shao et al. [339], where binocular receptive field properties are learned and aligned with human visual perception.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shao, F., Li, K., Lin, W., Jiang, G., Yu, M., & Dai, Q.
Affiliations
  • Ningbo University (CN)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2015-10
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
2971-2983
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2293889938
Cited by
116
References
69
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 5
FWCI
18.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61271021, 61271270, U1301257)
  • K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
stereoscopic image quality assessment, full-reference quality metrics, binocular combination, visual perception, 3D image quality
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Depth Perception, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Models, Biological, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Photogrammetry, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Biomimetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review