The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The time required for water attack at the phosphorus atom of simple phosphodiesters and of DNA
Open accessAbstract
Phosphodiester linkages, including those that join the nucleotides of DNA, are highly resistant to spontaneous hydrolysis. The rate of water attack at the phosphorus atom of phosphodiesters is known only as an upper limit, based on the hydrolysis of the dimethyl phosphate anion. That reaction was found to proceed at least 99% by C–O cleavage, at a rate suggesting an upper limit of 10 −15 s −1 for P–O cleavage of phosphodiester anions at 25°C. To evaluate the rate enhancement produced by P–O cleaving phosphodiesterases such as staphylococcal nuclease, we decided to establish the actual value of the rate constant for P–O cleavage of a simple phosphodiester anion. In dineopentyl phosphate, C–O cleavage is sterically precluded so that hydrolysis occurs only by P–O cleavage. Measurements at elevated temperatures indicate that the dineopentyl phosphate anion undergoes hydrolysis in water with a t 1/2 of 30,000,000 years at 25°C, furnishing an indication of the resistance of the internucleotide linkages of DNA to water attack at phosphorus. These results imply that staphylococcal nuclease ( k cat = 95 s −1 ) enhances the rate of phosphodiester hydrolysis by a factor of ≈10 17 . In alkaline solution, thymidylyl-3′-5′-thymidine (TpT) has been reported to decompose 10 5 -fold more rapidly than does dineopentyl phosphate. We find however that TpT and thymidine decompose at similar rates and with similar activation parameters, to a similar set of products, at pH 7 and in 1 M KOH. We infer that the decomposition of TpT is initiated by the breakdown of thymidine, not by phosphodiester hydrolysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oivanen, M., Kuusela, S., & Lönnberg, H. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960425x · Cited by 438
Cited by
Electrostatic Basis for Enzyme Catalysis
Warshel, A., Sharma, P. K., Kato, M., Xiang, Y., Liu, H., & Olsson, M. H. M. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0503106 · Cited by 1,444
DNA-encoded chemistry: enabling the deeper sampling of chemical space
Goodnow, R. A., Dumelin, C. E., & Keefe, A. D. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.213 · Cited by 621
Gates, K. S. (2009) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx900242k · Cited by 484
Statistical physics of self-replication
England, J. L. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4818538 · Cited by 449
Chain and conformation stability of solid-state DNA: implications for room temperature storage
Bonnet, J., Colotte, M., Coudy, D., Couallier, V., Portier, J., Morin, B., & Tuffet, S. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp1060 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Schroeder, G. K., Lad, C., Wyman, P., Williams, N. H., & Wolfenden, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-03-06
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4052-4055
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1991153821
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The time required for water attack at the phosphorus atom of simple phosphodiesters and of DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0510879103
- The paper
- Schroeder, G. K., Lad, C., Wyman, P., Williams, N. H., & Wolfenden, R. (2006). The time required for water attack at the phosphorus atom of simple phosphodiesters and of DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510879103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.