Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238Sexual Differentiation and DisordersLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biological versus nonbiological older brothers and men’s sexual orientation

Open access
Bogaert, Anthony F.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The most consistent biodemographic correlate of sexual orientation in men is the number of older brothers (fraternal birth order). The mechanism underlying this effect remains unknown. In this article, I provide a direct test pitting prenatal against postnatal (e.g., social/rearing) mechanisms. Four samples of homosexual and heterosexual men (total n = 944), including one sample of men raised in nonbiological and blended families (e.g., raised with half- or step-siblings or as adoptees) were studied. Only biological older brothers, and not any other sibling characteristic, including nonbiological older brothers, predicted men’s sexual orientation, regardless of the amount of time reared with these siblings. These results strongly suggest a prenatal origin to the fraternal birth-order effect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0511152103

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.524 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.644 · DOI
  3. R. Blanchard Annu. Rev. Sex Res. 8, 27–67 (1997).
  4. 10.1037/0735-7044.111.6.1395 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.233 · DOI · Paper page
  6. I. L. Ward Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology: Sexual Differentiation, eds A. A. Gerail, H. Moltz, I. L. Ward (Plenum, New York, 1992).

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bogaert, A. F.
Affiliations
Brock University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bogaert, Anthony F.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-07-11
Volume
103
Issue
28
Pages
10771-10774
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2137113462
Cited by
238
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
sexual orientation, older brothers, biological siblings, adopted children, stepfamilies, prenatal origin, gay men, heterosexual men
MeSH terms
Adoption, Birth Order, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Sexual Behavior, Homosexuality, Male, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.