The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potency of Michael reaction acceptors as inducers of enzymes that protect against carcinogenesis depends on their reactivity with sulfhydryl groups
Open accessAbstract
Induction of phase 2 enzymes and elevations of glutathione are major and sufficient strategies for protecting mammals and their cells against the toxic and carcinogenic effects of electrophiles and reactive forms of oxygen. Inducers belong to nine chemical classes and have few common properties except for their ability to modify sulfhydryl groups by oxidation, reduction, or alkylation. Much evidence suggests that the cellular “sensor” molecule that recognizes the inducers and signals the enhanced transcription of phase 2 genes does so by virtue of unique and highly reactive sulfhydryl functions that recognize and covalently react with the inducers. Benzylidene-alkanones and -cycloalkanones are Michael reaction acceptors whose inducer potency is profoundly increased by the presence of ortho- (but not other) hydroxyl substituent(s) on the aromatic ring(s). This enhancement correlates with more rapid reactivity of the ortho -hydroxylated derivatives with model sulfhydryl compounds. Proton NMR spectroscopy provides no evidence for increased electrophilicity of the β-vinyl carbons (the presumed site of nucleophilic attack) on the hydroxylated inducers. Surprisingly, these ortho -hydroxyl groups display a propensity for extensive intermolecular hydrogen bond formation, which may raise the reactivity and facilitate addition of mercaptans, thereby raising inducer potencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Itoh, K., Chiba, T., Takahashi, S., Ishii, T., Igarashi, K., Katoh, Y., Oyake, T., Hayashi, N., Satoh, K., Hatayama, I., et al. (1997) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.1997.6943 · Cited by 3,999
Itoh, K., Wakabayashi, N., Katoh, Y., Ishii, T., Igarashi, K., Engel, J. D., & Yamamoto, M. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.1.76 · Cited by 3,634
Cited by
Role of nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity
Ma, Q. (2013) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011112-140320 · Cited by 4,903
Cancer chemoprevention with dietary phytochemicals
Surh, Y.-J. (2003) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1189 · Cited by 2,955
The KEAP1-NRF2 system: a thiol-based sensor-effector apparatus for maintaining redox homeostasis
Yamamoto, M., Kensler, T. W., & Motohashi, H. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00023.2017 · Cited by 1,968
Dinkova-Kostova, A. T., Holtzclaw, W. D., Cole, R. N., Itoh, K., Wakabayashi, N., Katoh, Y., Yamamoto, M., & Talalay, P. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.172398899 · Cited by 1,947
Self-citationThe Molecular Mechanisms Regulating the KEAP1-NRF2 Pathway
Baird, L., & Yamamoto, M. (2020) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00099-20 · Cited by 1,542
Metadata
- Authors
- Dinkova-Kostova, A. T., Massiah, M. A., Bozak, R. E., Hicks, R. J., & Talalay, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-03-13
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3404-3409
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2114744780
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potency of Michael reaction acceptors as inducers of enzymes that protect against carcinogenesis depends on their reactivity with sulfhydryl groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.051632198
- The paper
- Dinkova-Kostova, A. T., Massiah, M. A., Bozak, R. E., Hicks, R. J., & Talalay, P. (2001). Potency of Michael reaction acceptors as inducers of enzymes that protect against carcinogenesis depends on their reactivity with sulfhydryl groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.051632198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.