Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted point mutations of p53 lead to dominant-negative inhibition of wild-type p53 function

Open access
de Vries, Annemieke, Flores, Elsa R., Miranda, Barbara, Hsieh, Harn-Mei, van Oostrom, Conny Th. M., Sage, Julien, Jacks, Tyler·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The p53 tumor suppressor gene is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancers, and germ-line p53 mutations cause a familial predisposition for cancer. Germ-line or sporadic p53 mutations are usually missense and typically affect the central DNA-binding domain of the protein. Because p53 functions as a tetrameric transcription factor, mutant p53 is thought to inhibit the function of wild-type p53 protein. Here, we studied the possible dominant-negative inhibition of wild-type p53 protein by two different, frequently occurring point mutations. The R270H and P275S mutations were targeted into the genome of mouse embryonic stem cells to allow the analysis of the effects of the mutant proteins expressed in normal cells at single-copy levels. In embryonic stem cells, the presence of a heterozygous point-mutated allele resulted in delayed transcriptional activation of several p53 downstream target genes on exposure to γ irradiation. Doxorubicin-induced apoptosis was severely affected in the mutant embryonic stem cells compared with wild-type cells. Heterozygous mutant thymocytes had a severe defect in p53 -dependent apoptotic pathways after treatment with γ irradiation or doxorubicin, whereas p53 -independent apoptotic pathways were intact. Together these data demonstrate that physiological expression of point-mutated p53 can strongly limit overall cellular p53 function, supporting the dominant-negative action of such mutants. Also, cells heterozygous for such mutations may be compromised in terms of tumor suppression and response to chemotherapeutic agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.052713099

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
de Vries, A., Flores, E. R., Miranda, B., Hsieh, H.-M., van Oostrom, C. T. M., Sage, J., & Jacks, T.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-02-26
Volume
99
Issue
5
Pages
2948-2953
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2166633890
Cited by
207
References
4
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted point mutations of p53 lead to dominant-negative inhibition of wild-type p53 function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.052713099
The paper
de Vries, A., Flores, E. R., Miranda, B., Hsieh, H.-M., van Oostrom, C. T. M., Sage, J., & Jacks, T. (2002). Targeted point mutations of p53 lead to dominant-negative inhibition of wild-type p53 function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.052713099

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.