Cited by 180Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyEnzyme Structure and FunctionVirology and Viral Diseases

X-ray structure of a native calicivirus: Structural insights into antigenic diversity and host specificity

Open access
Chen, Rong, Neill, John D., Estes, Mary K., Prasad, B. V. Venkataram·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Caliciviruses, grouped into four genera, are important human and veterinary pathogens with a potential for zoonosis. In these viruses, capsid-related functions such as assembly, antigenicity, and receptor interactions are predominantly encoded in a single protein that forms an icosahedral capsid. Understanding of the immunologic functions and pathogenesis of human caliciviruses in the Norovirus and Sapovirus genera is hampered by the lack of a cell culture system or animal models. Much of our understanding of these viruses, including the structure, has depended on recombinant capsids. Here we report the atomic structure of a native calicivirus from the Vesivirus genus that exhibits a broad host range possibly including humans and map immunological function onto a calicivirus structure. The vesivirus structure, despite a similar architectural design as seen in the recombinant norovirus capsid, exhibits novel features and indicates how the unique modular organization of the capsid protein with interdomain flexibility, similar to an antibody structure with a hinge and an elbow, integrates capsid-related functions and facilitates strain diversity in caliciviruses. The internally located N-terminal arm participates in a novel network of interactions through domain swapping to assist the assembly of the shell domain into an icosahedral scaffold, from which the protruding domain emanates. Neutralization epitopes localize to three hypervariable loops in the distal portion of the protruding domain surrounding a region that exhibits host-specific conservation. These observations suggest a mechanism for antigenic diversity and host specificity in caliciviruses and provide a structural framework for vaccine development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0600421103

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The distal P domain of vesivirus 2117 is morphologically distinct from that seen in other known vesivirus structures.

    “showing that the distal P domain of vesivirus 2117 is morphologically distinct from that seen in other known vesivirus structures.”

    From Vesivirus 2117 capsids more closely resemble sapovirus and lagovirus particles than other known vesivirus structures (2017) · cites this paper as [14]

    The P-domain section compares the distal P2 subdomain of San Miguel sea lion virus (SMSV) with that of Norwalk virus, and the Discussion describes differences between those viruses. A search for “vesivirus 2117” found no passage about its structure, so our copy does not establish the claimed distinction from other vesivirus structures. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Read, R. J. & Kleywegt, G. J. (2001) in Methods in Macromolecular Crystal- lography, eds. Turk, D. & Johnson, L. (IOS, Amsterdam), pp. 123-135.
  2. Carson, M. (1997) in Methods in Enzymology, eds. Sweet, R. M. & Carter, C. W. (Academic, New York), Vol. 277, pp. 493-505.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, R., Neill, J. D., Estes, M. K., & Prasad, B. V. V.
Affiliations
  • *Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and
  • National Animal Disease Center (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-05-23
Volume
103
Issue
21
Pages
8048-8053
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2126217050
Cited by
180
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Welch Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P01AI-57788, P01AI057788)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
calicivirus, Vesivirus, norovirus, sapovirus, capsid structure, icosahedral capsid, antigenic diversity, host specificity, neutralizing epitopes, domain swapping, interdomain flexibility, capsid assembly, vaccine development, zoonoses
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Antigenic Variation, Caliciviridae, Capsid, Molecular Conformation, Molecular Sequence Data, X-Rays, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Vesicular exanthema of swine virus, Crystallography, X-Ray

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review