Cited by 34Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsEnzyme Structure and Function

Cryo-EM Structure of a Novel Calicivirus, Tulane Virus

Open access
Yu, Guimei, Zhang, Dongsheng, Guo, Fei, Tan, Ming, Jiang, Xi, Jiang, Wen·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Tulane virus (TV) is a newly isolated cultivatable calicivirus that infects juvenile rhesus macaques. Here we report a 6.3 Å resolution cryo-electron microscopy structure of the TV virion. The TV virion is about 400 Å in diameter and consists of a T = 3 icosahedral protein capsid enclosing the RNA genome. 180 copies of the major capsid protein VP1 (∼57 KDa) are organized into two types of dimers A/B and C/C and form a thin, smooth shell studded with 90 dimeric protrusions. The overall capsid organization and the capsid protein fold of TV closely resemble that of other caliciviruses, especially of human Norwalk virus, the prototype human norovirus. These close structural similarities support TV as an attractive surrogate for the non-cultivatable human noroviruses. The most distinctive feature of TV is that its C/C dimers are in a highly flexible conformation with significantly reduced interactions between the shell (S) domain and the protruding (P) domain of VP1. A comparative structural analysis indicated that the P domains of TV C/C dimers were much more flexible than those of other caliciviruses. These observations, combined with previous studies on other caliciviruses, led us to hypothesize that the enhanced flexibility of C/C dimer P domains are likely required for efficient calicivirus-host cell interactions and the consequent uncoating and genome release. Residues in the S-P1 hinge between the S and P domain may play a critical role in the flexibility of P domains of C/C dimers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0059817

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The P2 domains of FCV form a rhombus-shaped structure with a flatter outer surface, similar to that of SMSV and Tulane virus.

    “Conversely, the P2 domains of FCV form a rhombus-shaped structure with a flatter outer surface (similar to that of SMSV and Tulane virus [36, 37]).”

    From Vesivirus 2117 capsids more closely resemble sapovirus and lagovirus particles than other known vesivirus structures (2017) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results section (“The Fold of the Major Capsid Protein (VP1) of TV”; page unavailable) compares Tulane virus’s P2 subdomain with SMSV but does not describe a rhombus shape or a flatter outer surface. The Results section on flexible P domains also compares Tulane virus and FCV without making that shape claim. Searches for “rhombus” and for FCV, SMSV, and P2 surface shape found no passage that verifies the attributed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, G., Zhang, D., Guo, F., Tan, M., Jiang, X., & Jiang, W.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Jiang, Wen
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-03-22
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
e59817
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992113841
Cited by
34
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Purdue University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI037093, R01AI089634)
  • National Center for Research Resources (S10RR023011)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
Tulane virus, calicivirus, norovirus, VP1 major capsid protein, icosahedral capsid, protruding domain, host-virus interaction, genome release
MeSH terms
Caliciviridae, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Capsid Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review