The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Legume genome evolution viewed through the Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus genomes
Open accessAbstract
Genome sequencing of the model legumes, Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus , provides an opportunity for large-scale sequence-based comparison of two genomes in the same plant family. Here we report synteny comparisons between these species, including details about chromosome relationships, large-scale synteny blocks, microsynteny within blocks, and genome regions lacking clear correspondence. The Lotus and Medicago genomes share a minimum of 10 large-scale synteny blocks, each with substantial collinearity and frequently extending the length of whole chromosome arms. The proportion of genes syntenic and collinear within each synteny block is relatively homogeneous. Medicago–Lotus comparisons also indicate similar and largely homogeneous gene densities, although gene-containing regions in Mt occupy 20–30% more space than Lj counterparts, primarily because of larger numbers of Mt retrotransposons. Because the interpretation of genome comparisons is complicated by large-scale genome duplications, we describe synteny, synonymous substitutions and phylogenetic analyses to identify and date a probable whole-genome duplication event. There is no direct evidence for any recent large-scale genome duplication in either Medicago or Lotus but instead a duplication predating speciation. Phylogenetic comparisons place this duplication within the Rosid I clade, clearly after the split between legumes and Salicaceae (poplar).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · Cited by 64,617
PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)
Felsenstein, J. (1989) · Cladistics · Cited by 17,682
The Pfam Protein Families Database
Bateman, A. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.276 · Cited by 14,000
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
<tt>BLAT</tt> —The <tt>BLAST</tt> -Like Alignment Tool
Kent, W. J. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229202 · Cited by 8,480
PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood
Yang, Z. (1997) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/13.5.555 · Cited by 5,373
The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt)
Bairoch, A. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki070 · Cited by 3,774
Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements
Jurka, J., Kapitonov, V. V., Pavlicek, A., Klonowski, P., Kohany, O., & Walichiewicz, J. (2005) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000084979 · Cited by 3,370
A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences.
(1994) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040153 · Cited by 1,960
Cited by
Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification
Soltis, D. E., Albert, V. A., Leebens‐Mack, J., Bell, C. D., Paterson, A. H., Zheng, C., Sankoff, D., de Pamphilis, C. W., Wall, P. K., & Soltis, P. S. (2009) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.0800079 · Cited by 1,257
A novel mode of chromosomal evolution peculiar to filamentous Ascomycete fungi
Hane, J. K., Rouxel, T., Howlett, B. J., Kema, G. H., Goodwin, S. B., & Oliver, R. P. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-r45 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Cannon, S. B., Sterck, L., Rombauts, S., Sato, S., Cheung, F., Gouzy, J., Wang, X., Mudge, J., Vasdewani, J., Schiex, T., Spannagl, M., Monaghan, E., Nicholson, C., Humphray, S. J., Schoof, H., Mayer, K. F. X., Rogers, J., Quétier, F., Oldroyd, G. E., Debellé, F., Cook, D. R., Retzel, E. F., Roe, B. A., Town, C. D., Tabata, S., Van de Peer, Y., & Young, N. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-10-03
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 14959-14964
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2159770366
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 30.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Legume genome evolution viewed through the Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0603228103
- The paper
- Cannon, S. B., Sterck, L., Rombauts, S., Sato, S., Cheung, F., Gouzy, J., Wang, X., Mudge, J., Vasdewani, J., Schiex, T., Spannagl, M., Monaghan, E., Nicholson, C., Humphray, S. J., Schoof, H., Mayer, K. F. X., Rogers, J., Quétier, F., Oldroyd, G. E., . . . Young, N. D. (2006). Legume genome evolution viewed through the Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603228103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.