The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the engine of anthropogenic iron cycles
Open accessAbstract
Stocks of products in use are the pivotal engines that drive anthropogenic metal cycles: They support the lives of people by providing services to them; they are sources for future secondary resources (scrap); and demand for in-use stocks generates demand for metals. Despite their great importance and their impacts on other parts of the metal cycles and the environment, the study of in-use stocks has heretofore been widely neglected. Here we investigate anthropogenic and geogenic iron stocks in the United States (U.S.) by analyzing the iron cycle over the period 1900–2004. Our results show the following. ( i ) Over the last century, the U.S. iron stock in use increased to 3,200 Tg (million metric tons), which is the same order of magnitude as the remaining U.S. iron stock in identified ores. On a global scale, anthropogenic iron stocks are less significant compared with natural ores, but their relative importance is increasing. ( ii ) With a perfect recycling system, the U.S. could substitute scrap utilization for domestic mining. ( iii ) The per-capita in-use iron stock reached saturation at 11–12 metric tons in ≈1980. This last finding, if applicable to other economies as well, could allow a significant improvement of long-term forecasting of steel demand and scrap availability in emerging market economies and therefore has major implications for resource sustainability, recycling technology, and industrial and governmental policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stock dynamics for forecasting material flows—Case study for housing in The Netherlands
B. Müller, D. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.025 · Cited by 513
Cited by
Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., Lauk, C., Haas, W., Tanikawa, H., Fishman, T., Miatto, A., Schandl, H., & Haberl, H. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1613773114 · Cited by 710
Carbon Emissions of Infrastructure Development
Müller, D. B., Liu, G., Løvik, A. N., Modaresi, R., Pauliuk, S., Steinhoff, F. S., & Brattebø, H. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es402618m · Cited by 445
Self-citationPauliuk, S., Milford, R. L., Müller, D. B., & Allwood, J. M. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es303149z · Cited by 334
Self-citationIndustrial ecology in integrated assessment models
Pauliuk, S., Arvesen, A., Stadler, K., & Hertwich, E. G. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3148 · Cited by 288
Mapping the global flow of steel: From steelmaking to end-use goods
Cullen, J. M., Allwood, J. M., & Bambach, M. D. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es302433p · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Müller, D. B., Wang, T., Duval, B., & Graedel, T. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-10-31
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 16111-16116
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2023114157
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the engine of anthropogenic iron cycles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0603375103
- The paper
- Müller, D. B., Wang, T., Duval, B., & Graedel, T. E. (2006). Exploring the engine of anthropogenic iron cycles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603375103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.