The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative high-throughput screening: A titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries
Open accessAbstract
High-throughput screening (HTS) of chemical compounds to identify modulators of molecular targets is a mainstay of pharmaceutical development. Increasingly, HTS is being used to identify chemical probes of gene, pathway, and cell functions, with the ultimate goal of comprehensively delineating relationships between chemical structures and biological activities. Achieving this goal will require methodologies that efficiently generate pharmacological data from the primary screen and reliably profile the range of biological activities associated with large chemical libraries. Traditional HTS, which tests compounds at a single concentration, is not suited to this task, because HTS is burdened by frequent false positives and false negatives and requires extensive follow-up testing. We have developed a paradigm, quantitative HTS (qHTS), tested with the enzyme pyruvate kinase, to generate concentration–response curves for >60,000 compounds in a single experiment. We show that this method is precise, refractory to variations in sample preparation, and identifies compounds with a wide range of activities. Concentration–response curves were classified to rapidly identify pyruvate kinase activators and inhibitors with a variety of potencies and efficacies and elucidate structure–activity relationships directly from the primary screen. Comparison of qHTS with traditional single-concentration HTS revealed a high prevalence of false negatives in the single-point screen. This study demonstrates the feasibility of qHTS for accurately profiling every compound in large chemical libraries (>10 5 compounds). qHTS produces rich data sets that can be immediately mined for reliable biological activities, thereby providing a platform for chemical genomics and accelerating the identification of leads for drug discovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhang, J.-H., Chung, T. D. Y., & Oldenburg, K. R. (1999) · SLAS Discovery · doi:10.1177/108705719900400206 · Cited by 6,847
Cited by
Xu, M., Lee, E. M., Wen, Z., Cheng, Y., Huang, W.-K., Qian, X., TCW, J., Kouznetsova, J., Ogden, S. C., Hammack, C., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4184 · Cited by 641
Self-citationTransforming Environmental Health Protection
Collins, F. S., Gray, G. M., & Bucher, J. R. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154619 · Cited by 630
A PHGDH inhibitor reveals coordination of serine synthesis and one-carbon unit fate
Pacold, M. E., Brimacombe, K. R., Chan, S. H., Rohde, J. M., Lewis, C. A., Swier, L. J. Y. M., Possemato, R., Chen, W. W., Sullivan, L. B., Fiske, B. P., et al. (2016) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2070 · Cited by 553
Self-citationKavlock, R., Chandler, K., Houck, K., Hunter, S., Judson, R., Kleinstreuer, N., Knudsen, T., Martin, M., Padilla, S., Reif, D., et al. (2012) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx3000939 · Cited by 494
Big data and artificial intelligence modeling for drug discovery
Zhu, H. (2020) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010919-023324 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Inglese, J., Auld, D. S., Jadhav, A., Johnson, R. L., Simeonov, A., Yasgar, A., Zheng, W., & Austin, C. P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 11473-11478
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2128879247
- Cited by
- 792
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative high-throughput screening: A titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0604348103
- The paper
- Inglese, J., Auld, D. S., Jadhav, A., Johnson, R. L., Simeonov, A., Yasgar, A., Zheng, W., & Austin, C. P. (2006). Quantitative high-throughput screening: A titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604348103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.