The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Engineering cottonseed for use in human nutrition by tissue-specific reduction of toxic gossypol
Open accessAbstract
Global cottonseed production can potentially provide the protein requirements for half a billion people per year; however, it is woefully underutilized because of the presence of toxic gossypol within seed glands. Therefore, elimination of gossypol from cottonseed has been a long-standing goal of geneticists. Attempts were made to meet this objective by developing so-called “glandless cotton” in the 1950s by conventional breeding techniques; however, the glandless varieties were commercially unviable because of the increased susceptibility of the plant to insect pests due to the systemic absence of glands that contain gossypol and other protective terpenoids. Thus, the promise of cottonseed in contributing to the food requirements of the burgeoning world population remained unfulfilled. We have successfully used RNAi to disrupt gossypol biosynthesis in cottonseed tissue by interfering with the expression of the δ-cadinene synthase gene during seed development. We demonstrate that it is possible to significantly reduce cottonseed-gossypol levels in a stable and heritable manner. Results from enzyme activity and molecular analyses on developing transgenic embryos were consistent with the observed phenotype in the mature seeds. Most relevant, the levels of gossypol and related terpenoids in the foliage and floral parts were not diminished, and thus their potential function in plant defense against insects and diseases remained untouched. These results illustrate that a targeted genetic modification, applied to an underutilized agricultural byproduct, provides a mechanism to open up a new source of nutrition for hundreds of millions of people.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The draft genome of a diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii
Wang, K., Wang, Z., Li, F., Ye, W., Wang, J., Song, G., Yue, Z., Cong, L., Shang, H., Zhu, S., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2371 · Cited by 1,009
Nonmeat Protein Alternatives as Meat Extenders and Meat Analogs
Asgar, M. A., Fazilah, A., Huda, N., Bhat, R., & Karim, A. A. (2010) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00124.x · Cited by 505
Silencing GhNDR1 and GhMKK2 compromises cotton resistance to Verticillium wilt
Gao, X., Wheeler, T., Li, Z., Kenerley, C. M., He, P., & Shan, L. (2011) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04491.x · Cited by 268
Hu, Q., Min, L., Yang, X., Jin, S., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Ma, Y., Qi, X., Li, D., Liu, H., et al. (2018) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.17.01628 · Cited by 258
Natural Products as Fungicide and Their Role in Crop Protection
Santra, H. K., & Banerjee, D. (2020) · Natural Bioactive Products in Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3024-1_9 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Sunilkumar, G., Campbell, L. M., Puckhaber, L., Stipanovic, R. D., & Rathore, K. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-11-28
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 18054-18059
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2028922415
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering cottonseed for use in human nutrition by tissue-specific reduction of toxic gossypol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0605389103
- The paper
- Sunilkumar, G., Campbell, L. M., Puckhaber, L., Stipanovic, R. D., & Rathore, K. S. (2006). Engineering cottonseed for use in human nutrition by tissue-specific reduction of toxic gossypol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605389103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.