Cited by 505Proteins in Food SystemsMeat and Animal Product QualityFood and Agricultural Sciences

Nonmeat Protein Alternatives as Meat Extenders and Meat Analogs

Asgar, M.A., Fazilah, A., Huda, Nurul, Bhat, Rajeev, Karim, A.A.·2010·Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety

Abstract

Abstract: The direct consumption of vegetable proteins in food products has been increasing over the years because of animal diseases, global shortage of animal protein, strong demand for wholesome and religious (halal) food, and economic reasons. The increasing importance of legume and oilseed proteins in the manufacturing of various functional food products is due to their high‐protein contents. However, the greatest obstacle to utilizing these legumes and oilseeds is the presence of antinutrients; but these antinutrients can be successfully removed or inactivated by employing certain processing methods. In contrast, the potential negative impact of the antinutrients is partially balanced by the fact that they may have a health‐promoting role. Legumes and oilseeds provide well‐balanced amino acid profiles when consumed with cereals. Soybean proteins, wheat gluten, cottonseed proteins, and other plant proteins have been used for texturization. Texturized vegetable proteins can extend meat products while providing an economical, functional, and high‐protein food ingredient or can be consumed directly as a meat analog. Meat analogs are successful because of their healthy image (cholesterol free), meat‐like texture, and low cost. Mycoprotein is fungal in origin and is used as a high‐protein, low‐fat, health‐promoting food ingredient. Mycoprotein has a good taste and texture. Texturized vegetable proteins and a number of mycoprotein products are accepted as halal foods. This article summarizes information regarding the molecular, nutritional, and functional properties of alternative protein sources to meat and presents current knowledge to encourage further research to optimize the beneficial effects of alternative protein sources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00124.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asgar, M. A., Fazilah, A., Huda, N., Bhat, R., & Karim, A. A.
Affiliations
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
  • Asgar, M.A.
  • Fazilah, A.
  • Huda, Nurul
  • Bhat, Rajeev
  • Karim, A.A.
Venue
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-26
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
513-529
ISSN
1541-4337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107274316
Cited by
505
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
meat extender, meat substitutes, textured vegetable protein, legume protein, oilseed proteins, antinutritional factors, soy protein, wheat gluten, cottonseed protein, mycoprotein, halal food, protein functional properties, amino acid composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review