The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Faithful replication of foraging techniques along cultural transmission chains by chimpanzees and children
Open accessAbstract
Observational studies of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) have revealed population-specific differences in behavior, thought to represent cultural variation. Field studies have also reported behaviors indicative of cultural learning, such as close observation of adult skills by infants, and the use of similar foraging techniques within a population over many generations. Although experimental studies have shown that chimpanzees are able to learn complex behaviors by observation, it is unclear how closely these studies simulate the learning environment found in the wild. In the present study we have used a diffusion chain paradigm, whereby a behavior is passed from one individual to the next in a linear sequence in an attempt to simulate intergenerational transmission of a foraging skill. Using a powerful three-group, two-action methodology, we found that alternative methods used to obtain food from a foraging device (“lift door” versus “slide door”) were accurately transmitted along two chains of six and five chimpanzees, respectively, such that the last chimpanzee in the chain used the same method as the original trained model. The fidelity of transmission within each chain is remarkable given that several individuals in the no-model control group were able to discover either method by individual exploration. A comparative study with human children revealed similar results. This study is the first to experimentally demonstrate the linear transmission of alternative foraging techniques by non-human primates. Our results show that chimpanzees have a capacity to sustain local traditions across multiple simulated generations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C., & Ratner, H. H. (1993) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0003123x · Cited by 1,891
Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195106237.001.0001 · Cited by 1,491
Cited by
Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707835105 · Cited by 941
Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution
Danchin, É., Charmantier, A., Champagne, F. A., Mesoudi, A., Pujol, B., & Blanchet, S. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3028 · Cited by 860
“have set the stage for empirical and experimental studies in this fiel”
BackgroundHurley, S. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07003123 · Cited by 512
Evolution of the Human Nervous System Function, Structure, and Development
Sousa, A. M. M., Meyer, K. A., Santpere, G., Gulden, F. O., & Sestan, N. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.036 · Cited by 517
Hobaiter, C., Poisot, T., Zuberbühler, K., Hoppitt, W., & Gruber, T. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001960 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Horner, V., Whiten, A., Flynn, E., & de Waal, F. B. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-09-12
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 13878-13883
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2128272101
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Faithful replication of foraging techniques along cultural transmission chains by chimpanzees and children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0606015103
- The paper
- Horner, V., Whiten, A., Flynn, E., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2006). Faithful replication of foraging techniques along cultural transmission chains by chimpanzees and children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606015103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.