Cited by 58Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network AnalysisGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Transcriptional regulation of protein complexes within and across species

Open access
Tan, Kai, Shlomi, Tomer, Feizi, Hoda, Ideker, Trey, Sharan, Roded·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Yeast two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation experiments have defined large-scale protein-protein interaction networks for many model species. Separately, systematic chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments have enabled the assembly of large networks of transcriptional regulatory interactions. To investigate the functional interplay between these two interaction types, we combined both within a probabilistic framework that models the cell as a network of transcription factors regulating protein complexes. This framework identified 72 putative coregulated complexes in yeast and allowed the prediction of 120 previously uncharacterized transcriptional interactions. Several predictions were tested by new microarray profiles, yielding a confirmation rate (58%) comparable with that of direct immunoprecipitation experiments. Furthermore, we extended our framework to a cross-species setting, identifying 24 coregulated complexes that were conserved between yeast and fly. Analyses of these conserved complexes revealed different conservation levels of their regulators and provided suggestive evidence that protein-protein interaction networks may evolve more slowly than transcriptional interaction networks. Our results demonstrate how multiple molecular interaction types can be integrated toward a global wiring diagram of the cell, and they provide insights into the evolutionary dynamics of protein complex regulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0606914104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Literature broadly has reported common co-regulation of genes in protein complexes at both transcription and translational levels.

    “This is a unique finding since literature broadly has reported common co-regulation of genes in protein complexes at both transcription and translational levels96–102.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, K., Shlomi, T., Feizi, H., Ideker, T., & Sharan, R.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-01-23
Volume
104
Issue
4
Pages
1283-1288
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2146243727
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  • International Business Machines Corporation
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES014811, R01ES014811)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
transcriptional regulation, protein complexes, protein-protein interaction network, transcriptional regulatory networks, network integration, cross-species conservation, network evolution, yeast, Drosophila, probabilistic networks
MeSH terms
Animals, Diptera, Gene Expression Regulation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Species Specificity, Transcription, Genetic, Two-Hybrid System Techniques, Immunoprecipitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review