Transcriptional regulation of protein complexes within and across species
Open accessAbstract
Yeast two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation experiments have defined large-scale protein-protein interaction networks for many model species. Separately, systematic chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments have enabled the assembly of large networks of transcriptional regulatory interactions. To investigate the functional interplay between these two interaction types, we combined both within a probabilistic framework that models the cell as a network of transcription factors regulating protein complexes. This framework identified 72 putative coregulated complexes in yeast and allowed the prediction of 120 previously uncharacterized transcriptional interactions. Several predictions were tested by new microarray profiles, yielding a confirmation rate (58%) comparable with that of direct immunoprecipitation experiments. Furthermore, we extended our framework to a cross-species setting, identifying 24 coregulated complexes that were conserved between yeast and fly. Analyses of these conserved complexes revealed different conservation levels of their regulators and provided suggestive evidence that protein-protein interaction networks may evolve more slowly than transcriptional interaction networks. Our results demonstrate how multiple molecular interaction types can be integrated toward a global wiring diagram of the cell, and they provide insights into the evolutionary dynamics of protein complex regulation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Literature broadly has reported common co-regulation of genes in protein complexes at both transcription and translational levels.
“This is a unique finding since literature broadly has reported common co-regulation of genes in protein complexes at both transcription and translational levels96–102.”
From EXOSC3 G191 Variants Trigger System-Wide Recalibration of RNA Processing Machinery (2026) · cites this paper as [102]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrative approaches for finding modular structure in biological networks
Mitra, K., Carvunis, A.-R., Ramesh, S. K., & Ideker, T. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3552 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrating physical and genetic maps: from genomes to interaction networks
Beyer, A., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Ideker, T. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2144 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Self-citationEXOSC3 G191 Variants Trigger System-Wide Recalibration of RNA Processing Machinery
Wijeratne, H. R. S., Runnebohm, A. M., Barron, M. P., Hampton, A. J., Li, R., Peck Justice, S. A., Lenceski, S. H., Rooney, J. D., Smith-Kinnaman, W. R., Chang, G. S., et al. (2026) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.26.701775 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“This is a unique finding since literature broadly has reported common co-regulation of genes in protein complexes at both transcription and translational levels 96-102 .”
- Authors
- Tan, K., Shlomi, T., Feizi, H., Ideker, T., & Sharan, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-01-23
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1283-1288
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC1783126
- OpenAlex
- W2146243727
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- David and Lucile Packard Foundation
- International Business Machines Corporation
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES014811, R01ES014811)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- transcriptional regulation, protein complexes, protein-protein interaction network, transcriptional regulatory networks, network integration, cross-species conservation, network evolution, yeast, Drosophila, probabilistic networks
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Diptera, Gene Expression Regulation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Species Specificity, Transcription, Genetic, Two-Hybrid System Techniques, Immunoprecipitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review