The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification and rationalization of the higher affinity of sodium over potassium to protein surfaces
Open accessAbstract
For a series of different proteins, including a structural protein, enzyme, inhibitor, protein marker, and a charge-transfer system, we have quantified the higher affinity of Na + over K + to the protein surface by means of molecular dynamics simulations and conductivity measurements. Both approaches show that sodium binds at least twice as strongly to the protein surface than potassium does with this effect being present in all proteins under study. Different parts of the protein exterior are responsible to a varying degree for the higher surface affinity of sodium, with the charged carboxylic groups of aspartate and glutamate playing the most important role. Therefore, local ion pairing is the key to the surface preference of sodium over potassium, which is further demonstrated and quantified by simulations of glutamate and aspartate in the form of isolated amino acids as well as short oligopeptides. As a matter of fact, the effect is already present at the level of preferential pairing of the smallest carboxylate anions, formate or acetate, with Na + versus K + , as shown by molecular dynamics and ab initio quantum chemical calculations. By quantifying and rationalizing the higher preference of sodium over potassium to protein surfaces, the present study opens a way to molecular understanding of many ion-specific (Hofmeister) phenomena involving protein interactions in salt solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phenomenological Theory of Ion Solvation. Effective Radii of Hydrated Ions
Nightingale, E. R. (1959) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j150579a011 · Cited by 3,505
COLLINS, K. (2004) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.03.021 · Cited by 1,091
Cited by
Hofmeister series and specific interactions of charged headgroups with aqueous ions
Vlachy, N., Jagoda-Cwiklik, B., Vácha, R., Touraud, D., Jungwirth, P., & Kunz, W. (2009) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2008.09.010 · Cited by 458
Self-citationHofmeister effects: an explanation for the impact of ionic liquids on biocatalysis
Yang, Z. (2009) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.04.011 · Cited by 398
Interactions and dynamics in electrolyte solutions by dielectric spectroscopy
Buchner, R., & Hefter, G. (2009) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b906555p · Cited by 318
Effects of Salt on the Lower Critical Solution Temperature of Poly (N-Isopropylacrylamide)
Du, H., Wickramasinghe, R., & Qian, X. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp105652c · Cited by 278
Spiegel, M. (2025) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.202403755 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Vrbka, L., Vondrášek, J., Jagoda-Cwiklik, B., Vácha, R., & Jungwirth, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-10-17
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 15440-15444
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1984666622
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification and rationalization of the higher affinity of sodium over potassium to protein surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0606959103
- The paper
- Vrbka, L., Vondrášek, J., Jagoda-Cwiklik, B., Vácha, R., & Jungwirth, P. (2006). Quantification and rationalization of the higher affinity of sodium over potassium to protein surfaces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606959103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.