The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cardiac myosin binding protein c phosphorylation is cardioprotective
Open accessAbstract
Cardiac myosin binding protein C (cMyBP-C) has three phosphorylatable serines at its N terminus (Ser-273, Ser-282, and Ser-302), and the residues' phosphorylation states may alter thick filament structure and function. To examine the effects of cMyBP-C phosphorylation, we generated transgenic mice with cardiac-specific expression of a cMyBP-C in which the three phosphorylation sites were mutated to aspartic acid, mimicking constitutive phosphorylation (cMyBP-C AllP+ ). The allele was bred into a cMyBP-C null background (cMyBP-C (t/t) ) to ensure the absence of endogenous dephosphorylated cMyBP-C. cMyBP-C AllP+ was incorporated normally into the cardiac sarcomere and restored normal cardiac function in the null background. However, subtle changes in sarcomere ultrastructure, characterized by increased distances between the thick filaments, indicated that phosphomimetic cMyBP-C affects thick–thin filament relationships, and yeast two-hybrid data and pull-down studies both showed that charged residues in these positions effectively prevented interaction with the myosin heavy chain. Confirming the physiological relevance of these data, the cMyBP-C AllP+:(t/t) hearts were resistant to ischemia–reperfusion injury. These data demonstrate that cMyBP-C phosphorylation functions in maintaining thick filament spacing and structure and can help protect the myocardium from ischemic injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dhandapany, P. S., Sadayappan, S., Xue, Y., Powell, G. T., Rani, D. S., Nallari, P., Rai, T. S., Khullar, M., Soares, P., Bahl, A., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.309 · Cited by 286
Self-citationGe, Y., Rybakova, I. N., Xu, Q., & Moss, R. L. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0813369106 · Cited by 154
van Dijk, S. J., Paalberends, E. R., Najafi, A., Michels, M., Sadayappan, S., Carrier, L., Boontje, N. M., Kuster, D. W. D., van Slegtenhorst, M., Dooijes, D., et al. (2012) · Circulation: Heart Failure · doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.111.963702 · Cited by 124
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadayappan, S., Osinska, H., Klevitsky, R., Lorenz, J. N., Sargent, M., Molkentin, J. D., Seidman, C. E., Seidman, J. G., & Robbins, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-11-07
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 16918-16923
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2077486687
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiac myosin binding protein c phosphorylation is cardioprotective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0607069103
- The paper
- Sadayappan, S., Osinska, H., Klevitsky, R., Lorenz, J. N., Sargent, M., Molkentin, J. D., Seidman, C. E., Seidman, J. G., & Robbins, J. (2006). Cardiac myosin binding protein c phosphorylation is cardioprotective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607069103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.