Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protein folding is slaved to solvent motions

Frauenfelder, H., Fenimore, P. W., Chen, G., McMahon, B. H.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Proteins, the workhorses of living systems, are constructed from chains of amino acids, which are synthesized in the cell based on the instructions of the genetic code and then folded into working proteins. The time for folding varies from microseconds to hours. What controls the folding rate is hotly debated. We postulate here that folding has the same temperature dependence as the α-fluctuations in the bulk solvent but is much slower. We call this behavior slaving. Slaving has been observed in folded proteins: Large-scale protein motions follow the solvent fluctuations with rate coefficient k α but can be slower by a large factor. Slowing occurs because large-scale motions proceed in many small steps, each determined by k α . If conformational motions of folded proteins are slaved, so a fortiori must be the motions during folding. The unfolded protein makes a Brownian walk in the conformational space to the folded structure, with each step controlled by k α . Because the number of conformational substates in the unfolded protein is extremely large, the folding rate coefficient, k f , is much smaller than k α . The slaving model implies that the activation enthalpy of folding is dominated by the solvent, whereas the number of steps n f = k α / k f is controlled by the number of accessible substates in the unfolded protein and the solvent. Proteins, however, undergo not only α- but also β-fluctuations. These additional fluctuations are local protein motions that are essentially independent of the bulk solvent fluctuations and may be relevant at late stages of folding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0607168103

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Frauenfelder, H., Fenimore, P. W., Chen, G., & McMahon, B. H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-10-17
Volume
103
Issue
42
Pages
15469-15472
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2141945073
Cited by
286
References
33
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein folding is slaved to solvent motions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0607168103
The paper
Frauenfelder, H., Fenimore, P. W., Chen, G., & McMahon, B. H. (2006). Protein folding is slaved to solvent motions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607168103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.