The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting protein–protein interactions based only on sequences information
Open accessAbstract
Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are central to most biological processes. Although efforts have been devoted to the development of methodology for predicting PPIs and protein interaction networks, the application of most existing methods is limited because they need information about protein homology or the interaction marks of the protein partners. In the present work, we propose a method for PPI prediction using only the information of protein sequences. This method was developed based on a learning algorithm-support vector machine combined with a kernel function and a conjoint triad feature for describing amino acids. More than 16,000 diverse PPI pairs were used to construct the universal model. The prediction ability of our approach is better than that of other sequence-based PPI prediction methods because it is able to predict PPI networks. Different types of PPI networks have been effectively mapped with our method, suggesting that, even with only sequence information, this method could be applied to the exploration of networks for any newly discovered protein with unknown biological relativity. In addition, such supplementary experimental information can enhance the prediction ability of the method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Self-citationGlobal Analysis of Protein Activities Using Proteome Chips
Zhu, H., Bilgin, M., Bangham, R., Hall, D., Casamayor, A., Bertone, P., Lan, N., Jansen, R., Bidlingmaier, S., Houfek, T., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062191 · Cited by 1,884
Cited by
Predicting Protein–Protein Interactions from the Molecular to the Proteome Level
Keskin, O., Tuncbag, N., & Gursoy, A. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00683 · Cited by 369
Predicting protein–protein interactions through sequence-based deep learning
Hashemifar, S., Neyshabur, B., Khan, A. A., & Xu, J. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty573 · Cited by 367
Xiao, N., Cao, D.-S., Zhu, M.-F., & Xu, Q.-S. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv042 · Cited by 334
Wei, L., Xing, P., Zeng, J., Chen, J., Su, R., & Guo, F. (2017) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2017.03.001 · Cited by 242
Chen, C., Zhang, Q., Yu, B., Yu, Z., Lawrence, P. J., Ma, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103899 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, J., Zhang, J., Luo, X., Zhu, W., Yu, K., Chen, K., Li, Y., & Jiang, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-03-13
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4337-4341
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1982267716
- Cited by
- 1,007
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting protein–protein interactions based only on sequences information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0607879104
- The paper
- Shen, J., Zhang, J., Luo, X., Zhu, W., Yu, K., Chen, K., Li, Y., & Jiang, H. (2007). Predicting protein–protein interactions based only on sequences information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607879104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.