Cited by 369Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Predicting Protein–Protein Interactions from the Molecular to the Proteome Level

Open access
Keskin, Ozlem, Tuncbag, Nurcan, Gursoy, Attila·2016·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

Identification of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is at the center of molecular biology considering the unquestionable role of proteins in cells. Combinatorial interactions result in a repertoire of multiple functions; hence, knowledge of PPI and binding regions naturally serve to functional proteomics and drug discovery. Given experimental limitations to find all interactions in a proteome, computational prediction/modeling of protein interactions is a prerequisite to proceed on the way to complete interactions at the proteome level. This review aims to provide a background on PPIs and their types. Computational methods for PPI predictions can use a variety of biological data including sequence-, evolution-, expression-, and structure-based data. Physical and statistical modeling are commonly used to integrate these data and infer PPI predictions. We review and list the state-of-the-art methods, servers, databases, and tools for protein-protein interaction prediction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00683

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNP and ATP5PO may be functionally related or operate together to mediate phenotypic features associated with UDN-P9's disease and hypomyelinating leukodystropy-20.

    “suggesting that they may be functionally related69–71 or operate together72,73 to mediate phenotypic features associated with UDN-P9’s disease and hypomyelinating leukodystropy-20”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 211 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keskin, O., Tuncbag, N., & Gursoy, A.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Informatics, Department of Health Informatics, Middle East Technical University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2016-04-13
Volume
116
Issue
8
Pages
4884-4909
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2341018731
Cited by
369
References
211
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 10 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Chemical Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (114C026)
  • Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (113E164, 114C026, 114M196)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, sequence-based prediction, structure-based prediction, statistical modeling, interaction databases
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, Humans, Protein Binding, Software, Gene Expression, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Proteome, Protein Interaction Mapping, Databases, Protein, Proteomics, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Data Mining, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review