The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Six-rowed barley originated from a mutation in a homeodomain-leucine zipper I-class homeobox gene
Open accessAbstract
Increased seed production has been a common goal during the domestication of cereal crops, and early cultivators of barley ( Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare ) selected a phenotype with a six-rowed spike that stably produced three times the usual grain number. This improved yield established barley as a founder crop for the Near Eastern Neolithic civilization. The barley spike has one central and two lateral spikelets at each rachis node. The wild-type progenitor ( H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum ) has a two-rowed phenotype, with additional, strictly rudimentary, lateral rows; this natural adaptation is advantageous for seed dispersal after shattering. Until recently, the origin of the six-rowed phenotype remained unknown. In the present study, we isolated vrs1 ( six-rowed spike 1 ), the gene responsible for the six-rowed spike in barley, by means of positional cloning. The wild-type Vrs1 allele (for two-rowed barley) encodes a transcription factor that includes a homeodomain with a closely linked leucine zipper motif. Expression of Vrs1 was strictly localized in the lateral-spikelet primordia of immature spikes, suggesting that the VRS1 protein suppresses development of the lateral rows. Loss of function of Vrs1 resulted in complete conversion of the rudimentary lateral spikelets in two-rowed barley into fully developed fertile spikelets in the six-rowed phenotype. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the six-rowed phenotype originated repeatedly, at different times and in different regions, through independent mutations of Vrs1 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics
Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195135848.001.0001 · Cited by 8,012
CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for protein classification
Marchler-Bauer, A. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki069 · Cited by 1,156
Cited by
Uga, Y., Sugimoto, K., Ogawa, S., Rane, J., Ishitani, M., Hara, N., Kitomi, Y., Inukai, Y., Ono, K., Kanno, N., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2725 · Cited by 1,611
Self-citationDeletion in a gene associated with grain size increased yields during rice domestication
Shomura, A., Izawa, T., Ebana, K., Ebitani, T., Kanegae, H., Konishi, S., & Yano, M. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.169 · Cited by 888
Self-citationCrop genomics: advances and applications
Morrell, P. L., Buckler, E. S., & Ross-Ibarra, J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3097 · Cited by 507
What Has Natural Variation Taught Us about Plant Development, Physiology, and Adaptation?
Alonso-Blanco, C., Aarts, M. G. M., Bentsink, L., Keurentjes, J. J. B., Reymond, M., Vreugdenhil, D., & Koornneef, M. (2009) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.109.068114 · Cited by 478
Alqudah, A. M., Sallam, A., Stephen Baenziger, P., & Börner, A. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2019.10.013 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Komatsuda, T., Pourkheirandish, M., He, C., Azhaguvel, P., Kanamori, H., Perovic, D., Stein, N., Graner, A., Wicker, T., Tagiri, A., Lundqvist, U., Fujimura, T., Matsuoka, M., Matsumoto, T., & Yano, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-01-23
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1424-1429
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2111491970
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Six-rowed barley originated from a mutation in a homeodomain-leucine zipper I-class homeobox gene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0608580104
- The paper
- Komatsuda, T., Pourkheirandish, M., He, C., Azhaguvel, P., Kanamori, H., Perovic, D., Stein, N., Graner, A., Wicker, T., Tagiri, A., Lundqvist, U., Fujimura, T., Matsuoka, M., Matsumoto, T., & Yano, M. (2007). Six-rowed barley originated from a mutation in a homeodomain-leucine zipper I-class homeobox gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608580104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.