The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global analysis of proteasomal substrate specificity using positional-scanning libraries of covalent inhibitors
Open accessAbstract
The proteasome is a large protease complex consisting of multiple catalytic subunits that function simultaneously to digest protein substrates. This complexity has made deciphering the role each subunit plays in the generation of specific protein fragments difficult. Positional scanning libraries of peptide vinyl sulfones were generated in which the amino acid located directly at the site of hydrolysis (P1 residue) was held constant and sequences distal to that residue (P2, P3, and P4 positions) were varied across all natural amino acids (except cysteine and methionine). Binding information for each of the individual catalytic subunits was obtained for each library under a variety of different conditions. The resulting specificity profiles indicated that substrate positions distal to P1 are critical for directing substrates to active subunits in the complex. Furthermore, specificity profiles of IFN-γ-regulated subunits closely matched those of their noninducible counterparts, suggesting that subunit swapping may modulate substrate processing by a mechanism that does require a change in the primary sequence specificity of individual catalytic subunits in the complex. Finally, specificity profiles were used to design specific inhibitors of a single active site in the complex. These reagents can be used to further establish the role of each subunit in substrate processing by the proteasome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quantitative reactivity profiling predicts functional cysteines in proteomes
Weerapana, E., Wang, C., Simon, G. M., Richter, F., Khare, S., Dillon, M. B. D., Bachovchin, D. A., Mowen, K., Baker, D., & Cravatt, B. F. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09472 · Cited by 1,684
Activity-Based Protein Profiling: From Enzyme Chemistry to Proteomic Chemistry
Cravatt, B. F., Wright, A. T., & Kozarich, J. W. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.101304.124125 · Cited by 1,270
Irreversible Inhibitors of Serine, Cysteine, and Threonine Proteases
Powers, J. C., Asgian, J. L., Ekici, Ö. D., & James, K. E. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr010182v · Cited by 1,090
Protease degradomics: A new challenge for proteomics
López-Otín, C., & Overall, C. M. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm858 · Cited by 664
Proteasome Inhibitors: An Expanding Army Attacking a Unique Target
Kisselev, A. F., van der Linden, W. A., & Overkleeft, H. S. (2012) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.01.003 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Nazif, T., & Bogyo, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-03-13
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2967-2972
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2044388904
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global analysis of proteasomal substrate specificity using positional-scanning libraries of covalent inhibitors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.061028898
- The paper
- Nazif, T., & Bogyo, M. (2001). Global analysis of proteasomal substrate specificity using positional-scanning libraries of covalent inhibitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.061028898
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.