Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 428

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of singlet oxygen and oxygen concentration in photodynamic inactivation of bacteria

Open access
Maisch, Tim, Baier, Jürgen, Franz, Barbara, Maier, Max, Landthaler, Michael, Szeimies, Rolf-Markus, Bäumler, Wolfgang·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

New antibacterial strategies are required in view of the increasing resistance of bacteria to antibiotics. One promising technique involves the photodynamic inactivation of bacteria. Upon exposure to light, a photosensitizer in bacteria can generate singlet oxygen, which oxidizes proteins or lipids, leading to bacteria death. To elucidate the oxidative processes that occur during killing of bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus was incubated with a standard photosensitizer, and the generation and decay of singlet oxygen was detected directly by its luminescence at 1,270 nm. At low bacterial concentrations, the time-resolved luminescence of singlet oxygen showed a decay time of 6 ± 2 μs, which is an intermediate time for singlet oxygen decay in phospholipids of membranes (14 ± 2 μs) and in the surrounding water (3.5 ± 0.5 μs). Obviously, at low bacterial concentrations, singlet oxygen had sufficient access to water outside of S. aureus by diffusion. Thus, singlet oxygen seems to be generated in the outer cell wall areas or in adjacent cytoplasmic membranes of S. aureus . In addition, the detection of singlet oxygen luminescence can be used as a sensor of intracellular oxygen concentration. When singlet oxygen luminescence was measured at higher bacterial concentrations, the decay time increased significantly, up to ≈40 μs, because of oxygen depletion at these concentrations. This observation is an important indicator that oxygen supply is a crucial factor in the efficacy of photodynamic inactivation of bacteria, and will be of particular significance should this approach be used against multiresistant bacteria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0611328104

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 428

Metadata

Authors
Maisch, T., Baier, J., Franz, B., Maier, M., Landthaler, M., Szeimies, R.-M., & Bäumler, W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-04-24
Volume
104
Issue
17
Pages
7223-7228
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2037591016
Cited by
428
References
40
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of singlet oxygen and oxygen concentration in photodynamic inactivation of bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0611328104
The paper
Maisch, T., Baier, J., Franz, B., Maier, M., Landthaler, M., Szeimies, R.-M., & Bäumler, W. (2007). The role of singlet oxygen and oxygen concentration in photodynamic inactivation of bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611328104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.