The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific φC31 integrases
Open accessAbstract
Germ-line transformation via transposable elements is a powerful tool to study gene function in Drosophila melanogaster . However, some inherent characteristics of transposon-mediated transgenesis limit its use for transgene analysis. Here, we circumvent these limitations by optimizing a φC31-based integration system. We generated a collection of lines with precisely mapped attP sites that allow the insertion of transgenes into many different predetermined intergenic locations throughout the fly genome. By using regulatory elements of the nanos and vasa genes, we established endogenous sources of the φC31 integrase, eliminating the difficulties of coinjecting integrase mRNA and raising the transformation efficiency. Moreover, to discriminate between specific and rare nonspecific integration events, a white gene-based reconstitution system was generated that enables visual selection for precise attP targeting. Finally, we demonstrate that our chromosomal attP sites can be modified in situ , extending their scope while retaining their properties as landing sites. The efficiency, ease-of-use, and versatility obtained here with the φC31-based integration system represents an important advance in transgenesis and opens up the possibility of systematic, high-throughput screening of large cDNA sets and regulatory elements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The art and design of genetic screens: Drosophila melanogaster
St Johnston, D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg751 · Cited by 644
Cited by
Refinement of Tools for Targeted Gene Expression in Drosophila
Pfeiffer, B. D., Ngo, T.-T. B., Hibbard, K. L., Murphy, C., Jenett, A., Truman, J. W., & Rubin, G. M. (2010) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.110.119917 · Cited by 1,153
Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in Drosophila
Port, F., Chen, H.-M., Lee, T., & Bullock, S. L. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1405500111 · Cited by 1,046
The C9orf72 repeat expansion disrupts nucleocytoplasmic transport.
Zhang, K., Donnelly, C. J., Haeusler, A. R., Grima, J. C., Machamer, J. B., Steinwald, P., Daley, E. L., Miller, S. J., Cunningham, K. M., Vidensky, S., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14973 · Cited by 982
Glial Lipid Droplets and ROS Induced by Mitochondrial Defects Promote Neurodegeneration
Liu, L., Zhang, K., Sandoval, H., Yamamoto, S., Jaiswal, M., Sanz, E., Li, Z., Hui, J., Graham, B. H., Quintana, A., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.019 · Cited by 876
Fluorescent fusion protein knockout mediated by anti-GFP nanobody
Caussinus, E., Kanca, O., & Affolter, M. (2012) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2180 · Cited by 510
Metadata
- Authors
- Bischof, J., Maeda, R. K., Hediger, M., Karch, F., & Basler, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-02-27
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3312-3317
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2052112605
- Cited by
- 1,866
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific φC31 integrases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0611511104
- The paper
- Bischof, J., Maeda, R. K., Hediger, M., Karch, F., & Basler, K. (2007). An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific φC31 integrases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611511104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.